Target isn't a black issue.Anyone noticed this agent always in every thread trying to downplay black issues ?
Why do you look at it as such?
Target isn't a black issue.Anyone noticed this agent always in every thread trying to downplay black issues ?
You ignore 4 years of failure and decline and try to ascribe it to an issue in the last 6 months.
This is a bigger deal than a boycott, which is why they let the CEO his contract wasn't renewed in March I believe.
Target is expensive, they gotta drop prices.
He's the fall guy. They agreed to the DEI shyt even though, as others said, they've been declining for a minute now.I’m not 100% sold on the DEI shyt even being the full reason.
short sighted is ignoring year long trends to focus on a few months. Right.I’m not ignoring it. I’ve said multiple times that’s part of the issue. I’m just not short sighted enough to think that people not returning as shoppers because of the policy shift has no impact. I guess Forbes writing stories on this was them being wrong too.
You crackers are fukking retarded, theyre losing money en masse in an unforced error. How was it a good strategic idea?No it was a good strategic idea from a business standpoint. They took a gamble that repercussions from a hostile federal administration would be worse for a company that engages in a lot of interstate commerce, than a temporary loss of sales from the liberal contingent.
We have seen what Trump has done to those universities and the law firms. And arguably he could strangle the entire companny, if Target decided to spearhead a resistance.
As we speak Costco is engaged in costly litigation in 19 states for doing exactly that. And the federal DOJ is looking for anything to trip them up also.
Well now you are being disingenuous and moving the goal posts. It went from no sustained impact to not criticalshort sighted is ignoring year long trends to focus on a few months. Right.
Looking at long term failure and decline isn't short sighted its longterm big picture thinking.
I think the boycott is a little blip on a long decline, so I don't see it as critical.
Target thought it was a Black issue. From cancelling contracts with Black vendors in it's anti DEI push, to trying to consult with Al Sharpton to bring back lost Black customers.Target isn't a black issue.
Why do you look at it as such?
Not disingenous at all. Haven't moved the goal post at all.Well now you are being disingenuous and moving the goal posts. It went from no sustained impact to not critical
We can agree to disagree and KIM
Nope. Never that.
That's the ol' blame the black guy tactic. Aka hot potato. Target has already been failing. They are going to continue to fail, and being as they're at a low they'll hire a black CEO, then as it continues to fail say "see! That's why you don't have a black ceo!"
Same thing when cities start to fall then all of a sudden you get a black mayor...and it continues to fall and it's "that's what you get when you have a black mayor"
Or police departments and fire departments fail, get sued, have recruitment issues, then they hire a black chief, and settle the suits, still have issues with recruitment and it's "the black chief is doing a terrible job!"
They won't remember who was there when the walls started crumbling but they'll know who was there when they fell.
Happens in football.
Black coach gets the job and he drags the team from trash to decent.....but they don't invest in a top QB or real elite offensive talent.
Get the team to competitive status and then hire a young white OC and give him all the tools he wants.