Tariq nasheed finally went too far

[Black Lightning]

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Outside of the coli I have never heard tariqs name mentioned by anyone ever

i've seen his HIDDEN COLORS up in peoples cribs (bootlegs)

but you're right, there's a cat on my friends list that is one of his loyalists, he's the only person I see constantly sharing his videos

 

[bigbadbossup2012]

I'm riding with Tariq against whomever.
What did he say that isn't true?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

John Lewis was following cracka ass liberal orders to not fight white people. The non violent strategy had nothing to do with MLK on some Ghandi shyt. Cac liberals would have pulled financial support if they harmed white people literally trying to kill them.

When MLK did speeches in the south he had to call up the Deacons because they were well known amongst white supremacists for being drillers. MLK couldn't even be known to have rolled with any Black people that carried guns. His own bodyguards weren't allowed to carry in fear that the white liberals up north would find out and stop bankrolling him. A lot of you nikkaz are an embarrassment for not even knowing your own history.

John Lewis was an athlete that followed crackaz orders even though they could have cost him his life. Ask yourself why you didn't learn about people like Robert F.Williams or the Deacons who were all bout that life but you know about a nikka who purposely got his ass whipped?? The nikka that got his ass whooped is y'alls hero but dudes who threw down with the police are forgotten in history. You nikkaz are fukking clowns.

You have to be ignorant to believe this shyt.

Who told you that? Where are their receipts?

You know that such a dumb claim wouldn't work in Gandhi's direction cause Gandhi was on White people's necks the whole time and drove the whole crew out of his country entirely. And there are clear, obvious receipts that MLK Jr. was stanning Gandhi from at least 1950 (when he heard a talk at Morehouse from Dr. Mordecai Johnson, who had just visited India) and had connected nonviolence with his own Biblical principles from at least that early.

Gandhi had already been writing for The Crisis from at least 1929 at the request of W.E.B. DuBois. Interest in Gandhi was FAR greater in the Black community than in the White community. Gandhi was in direct communication with W.E.B. DuBois for 30 years at least from as early as when they did a racial equality conference together in 1911. John Dube was neighbors with Gandhi, S.S. Tema was close to Gandhi. Marcus Garvey and Gandhi sent letters and books back-and-forth to each other, as did George Washington Carver. Hubert Harrison called him "the greatest, most unselfish and powerful leader of the modern world" Bildad Kaggia called Gandhi his inspiration, Jomo Kenyatta said that he cherished Gandhi, Nnamdi Azikiwe said that history has proven Gandhi's ways were correct, Albert Luthuli said that with Gandhi the Africans and the Indians joined together in struggle, Kenneth Kaunda said that Gandhi's ways could be the answer, Joshua Nkomo said that Gandhi showed them that independence could be more than just a dream, Kwame Nkrumah mourned his death and credited him with inspiring him to extend the struggle to all Africa. Aminu Kano, Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, and Julius Nyerere all called Gandhi an inspiration.

And on top of that, MLK Jr's ideological commitment to nonviolence was deeply rooted in his own Biblical principles. You can see how he invokes the Sermon on the Mount and the principles of the Gospel from the very beginning. You do NOT risk your life as often as MLK Jr. did for some damn White people money if you don't believe exactly what you say and the reasons behind why you are doing it.

White people from the North didn't even like MLK Jr. like you're making it out to be. To attribute all the accomplishments and direction of the CRM to some Yankee Whites is like a fukking Southern White Confederate conspiracy theory, claiming that Black people can't do nothing by themselves and if they're accomplishing anything it must be because Northern Whites are secretly pulling the strings from behind the scenes. That's some total bullshyt.



edit: One of the funniest parts of that whole conspiracy is that it's based on the idea that Northern White liberals didn't want to see Southern White racists get harmed, as if they hadn't recently been killing each other by the hundreds of thousands with no reservations. Northern White liberals and Southern White racists could give a fukk about each other.

 

[Lord_Chief_Rocka]

Such a disgusting tweet

 

[The_Truth]

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

I didn't call them c00ns because I disagree with their politics, I called them c00ns specifically because they want a presence in white supremacy power structure.
I clearly wrote that, in the comment you quoted.
Its okay though, I know a lot of people like yourself suffer from poor reading comprehension

the posters you trying to call out probably believe the same thing about you,, hence the "agent" talk. so basically, when you have flimsy principles, you can can pick and choose when to be childish on some

lol, take your own advice kid

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

Um, I was on the fence about this, but the language in the titles of bills he's sponsored in terms of civil rights usually has the words: proposing, rewarding, honoring, celebrating, observing, or something symbolic. Curiously, bills coming out of the 90s to early 2000s are more stronger in language, use the symbolic words less frequently, or less abstract in subject matter.

Also less passive in terms of what the bills should accomplish.

Also, many of the bills haven't been introduced or passed in house.

can you post some so we can see if it was something he voted with or against or if it was even in his jurisdiction? did those bills pass? this is something i notice about a lot the people on one side of this argument. posts with rhetoric instead of links lol. lets have a constructive conversation and teach each other.
On another note, lets face the fact, if the past militants did much better than the passive politicians, we wouldn't be where we are as a community, crab in barrel mentality even stronger than ever. nothing has really worked so far on either side (other than civil rights passing 60 years ago, and some of which now are in jeopardy) so who is to say one approach is better than the other.

 

[Originalman]

Got damn dap + rep

 

[Y2Dre]

Outside of the coli I have never heard tariqs name mentioned by anyone ever

I was at the premiere of the first hidden colors in NYC, and the line was down the block.

They was all brehs?

 

[KingJudah2]

Tariq may be abrasive but he isn't wrong. John Lewis is nothing more than a token negro that does NOTHING for African Americans. He fights harder for immigrants that African Americans all the time.

He's nothing but a civil rights good luck charm and probably an agent like most of the pastors that rolled with MLK.

He should retire an let a black person with a clear black agenda take his position. He's easily one of the weakest Congress members we have.

Yep, that nikka been talking about the 60s for 40 years in congress. There are NEW problems. John Lewis is like a hood ornament for liberals in general

 

[David_TheMan]

the posters you trying to call out probably believe the same thing about you,, hence the "agent" talk. so basically, when you have flimsy principles, you can can pick and choose when to be childish on some

lol, take your own advice kid

Your argument makes no sense since I didnt specifically call out any posters, but specifically did call out politicians and my personal interaction with thise people as yhe basis for calling them a c00n, not saying they are c00ns because we disagree. .

So ahain try to actually read and but that brain to use , and make applicable arguments and statements with regard to what I have posted. Thanks

 

[Jammer22]

can you post some so we can see if it was something he voted with or against or if it was even in his jurisdiction? did those bills pass? this is something i notice about a lot the people on one side of this argument. posts with rhetoric instead of links lol. lets have a constructive conversation and teach each other.
On another note, lets face the fact, if the past militants did much better than the passive politicians, we wouldn't be where we are as a community, crab in barrel mentality even stronger than ever. nothing has really worked so far on either side (other than civil rights passing 60 years ago, and some of which now are in jeopardy) so who is to say one approach is better than the other.

I looked at your link on page 16, the one of his professional profile. Good link for studying up on him and hi s co-sponsors.Helps in regards of what we should look for too.

After that, I looked at the tracker to see if any bills sponsored or co-sponsored by him were passed into law and any recent actions that took place with said bills.

On the plus side for him, I can say he concentrates on civil rights and has cosponsored many bills in that area. Recent bills have passed through too.

 

[KingJudah2]

Well than that's slightly different then not voting at all.

I still disagree with that approach because the stakes are too high. But I understand the frustration.

At the end of the day money is the currency of power. Voting alone doesn't work. These politicians respond to financial influence.

This is a game we still don't collectively know how to play in 2018.

lol at stakes are too high. You falling for the Democrips "Trump is hitler" catch phrases. you gonna be poor and neglected whether its democrat or republican,what don't you nikkas understand bout that? If you're in a majority black town or city, we need black agenda candidates, and they would win too but they too scary.

 

[Originalman]

Well I already know that Ivy Leaguers run America and that they put one another in positions of power in order to consolidate wealth and power. They literally spun up the CIA so that can use US resources and military prowess to serve corporate interest globally and completely bypassing congressional, presidential, and public approval while doing so. The importance of the Fed being independent however is that it exists outside of the current government structure. So let’s say another JFK type comes along and he is successful this time in gutting the CIA, stopping all the wars, cutting out the corruption and lobbying...HE STILL COULDN’T TOUCH THE FED! There are no checks and balances there and there’s huge power in that.

Yes sir this is so true. I remember in say 2007 or 2008 the Fed loaned maybe like 5 bill or more to an unknown entity and the media slightly covered it. Of course we were going through a recession so it got some news. But everyone was on some.. the Fed can do what they want we ain't got no control over them.

At the end of the day the Fed was creates by banks. Banks have ran the western world for centuries. It is what it is.