And their journals/publications/studies are all available to read.
kizzmekia corbett (NIH moderna affiliate and also the lead vaccine developer) is the first author on plenty of papers. You can review her work if you want.
Correlation does not imply causation no matter how adamant you choose to be about it. Until you can lay out the biological pathway that caused this you're assertion is nothing more than speculation.
It's one thing to be a author of studies you produced that are independently reviewed that gives a fair balance research on drugs and interaction. However it's in direct conflict of interest that you being a NIH( Gov't employee and a Big Pharma affiliate) that you can't bring un-bias and clear and direct research to the public eye.
Let's take Medical Journals per say...
It's ok to advertise drugs and promotion of drugs...
https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/how-to-advertise?query=footer
Advertising in Medical Journals: Should Current Practices Change?
Persuading the Prescribers: Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing and its Influence on Physicians and Patients
Medical Journals and Big Pharma buddy buddy
Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows
Advertising monies enable prestigious journals to get thousands of copies into doctors’ hands for free, which “almost certainly” goes on to affect prescribing.
Journals are willing to accept even the most highly misleading advertisements. The FDA has flagged numerous instances of advertising violations, including ads that overstated a drug’s effectiveness or minimized its risks. Journals will guarantee favorable editorial mentions of a product in order to earn a company’s advertising dollars. Journals can earn substantial fees for publishing supplements even when they are written by “paid industry hacks”—and the more favorable the supplement content is to the company that is funding it, the bigger the profit for the journal.
Industry Funding Studies
Industry Funding of Clinical Trials: Benefit or Bias?
Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review
“growing doubts about the validity of the scientific evidence underpinning [influenza vaccine] policy recommendations,”
Studies] sponsored by industry had greater visibility as they were more likely to be published by high impact factor journals and were likely to be given higher prominence by the international scientific and lay media, despite their apparent equivalent methodological quality and size compared with studies with other funders.
Risk than Rewards..
Patients at risk as UK universities fail to disclose results of clinical trials
Bias Research
Bias in Clinical Intervention Research
Dark Side of Medical Research: Widespread Bias and Omissions | Live Science
Unproven Data
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines as an option for preventing cervical malignancies: (how) effective and safe? - PubMed
Publish Research being false..
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of NEJM
“
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.”
Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), a Harvard professor of medicine and also a former Editor-in-Chief of NEMJ, was frustrated that
“the medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”
Dr. Mahin Khatami, who is a former program director at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). Banned from speaking about HPV Vaccines dangers
“The establishment is entitled to glamorize and publicize too many drugs or vaccines with little/no ethical or safety considerations for short, or long-term health hazards of such projects… Majority of vaccines that were designed to prevent diseases caused more death and diseases than public exposures to infective agents. Policy makers and the public should take a closer look at the long-lasting ‘medical/scientific ponzi schemes’ that the cancer establishment created to control a drug-dependent sick society.”
Formation of a highly ordered and sophisticated medical hierarchy (establishment) in the nineteenth/twentieth century within higher education institutions (e.g., medical schools, organizations) was supported by businessmen and philanthropists with motives to profit from the sale of drugs.”
Tamang Sharma, a PhD student at Cochrane and lead author of the study, said:
“We found that a lot of the appendices were often only available upon request to the authorities, and the authorities had never requested them. I’m actually kind of scared about how bad the actual situation would be if we had the complete data.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172306/
Dr. Richard Horton, the current Editor-in-Chief
“
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”
Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
Medical Malpractice and errors kill 400,000 people a year is a real thing....so correlation is there.