Techbros crash a women in tech conference by claiming non-binary

Rick Fox at UNC

All Star
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
5,403
Reputation
1,248
Daps
12,435
Reppin
Pretty Boys
This is embarassing. I have a difficult time imagining what a pathetic STEM education you got and how sad your workplace must be if you've never met a single talented woman at either one.

I knew dozens of women who I'm sure could lap you up anytime from my undergrad circles alone.

We have different definitions of talent, maybe?

Regarding school, I've roomed with asian girls who attended MIT, cats who graduated from Sorbonne and University of Tokyo, Pitt, Berkeley, etc. None of it matters, this ain't Wall Street (doesn't even matter there). I enjoyed them, some great people, they are good at "doing the thing" required to progress through school. Following directions and all of that, great. The school thing is cool, but the guy who founded Signal, some fukk up with a passion for Cryptography. That's the ethos I'm talking about.

Not sure where you work, it really doesn't matter. For me, forget a F500, or F50--Fortune 10's building and managing at extreme scale. Who built the infra? A bunch of dudes. Who manages and scales it? A bunch of dudes. Who created the tools? A bunch of dudes. Who attends tech conferences like NANOG, DefCon, NDSS for fun, a bunch of dudes. Who created the culture, a bunch of dudes. I've seen cats like, "yo this thing isn't doing what we need it to do, fukk it, lets create our own." Two months later that thing is being deployed in 100's datacenters. Dudes.

Walk into your local Equinix or CoreSite datacenter. Who is operating the infra? A bunch of dudes.

Why you think San Fran, Boston, DC, etc. are filled with lame ass guys who sit around and obsess about machines all day?

There was no "path" created for dudes in tech, they just did it. It is what it is.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
We have different definitions of talent, maybe?

Regarding school, I've roomed with asian girls who attended MIT, cats who graduated from Sorbonne and University of Tokyo, Pitt, Berkeley, etc. None of it matters, this ain't Wall Street (doesn't even matter there). I enjoyed them, some great people, they are good at "doing the thing" required to progress through school. Following directions and all of that, great. The school thing is cool, but the guy who founded Signal, some fukk up with a passion for Cryptography. That's the ethos I'm talking about.

If we're talking about employment across an entire industry, why would you reduce the conversation to a talent level that 99.9% of companies hiring will never dream of finding?

Unicorns like Niki Parmar have helped transform the entire industry, but that's neither here nor there. The random woman-hating shyt you were on was ridiculous.

Like I said, I've known plenty of women who could run circles around you. So stop trying to ride the testosterone coattails of other men who wouldn't give you the time of day.




Not sure where you work, it really doesn't matter. For me, forget a F500, or F50--Fortune 10's building and managing at extreme scale. Who built the infra? A bunch of dudes. Who manages and scales it? A bunch of dudes. Who created the tools? A bunch of dudes. Who attends tech conferences like NANOG, DefCon, NDSS for fun, a bunch of dudes. Who created the culture, a bunch of dudes. I've seen cats like, "yo this thing isn't doing what we need it to do, fukk it, lets create our own." Two months later that thing is being deployed in 100's datacenters. Dudes.

Walk into your local Equinix or CoreSite datacenter. Who is operating the infra? A bunch of dudes.

Why you think San Fran, Boston, DC, etc. are filled with lame ass guys who sit around and obsess about machines all day?

There was no "path" created for dudes in tech, they just did it. It is what it is.

50 years ago, you could have claimed that women can't do any STEM field. 30 years ago, you could say, "Well, maybe they can do it, but men have done all the real development." Whereas now, if you tried to claim women couldn't compete at the highest levels of chemistry, physics, biotech, etc., you'd be laughed out of the room.

Some years ago I read an Arlene Blum biography and they were literally telling women that they couldn't be chemists in the 1970s. As in there were entire graduate schools without a single female student in the field, as in she was applying to departments who had literally never awarded a PhD to a woman in her specialty. The sexist shyt she got told as she made her way through school was wild.

Tech bros who don't think women can compete in tech sound like just as big of idiots as those 1970s gatekeepers, only it's even easier to laugh at you now because society has moved on.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
Average Techie make more than RNs now? Ok :skip:


Great goalpost shift. First it was "nursing and dental assistant", now that you realized you exposed yourself, suddenly it's only specifically "RNs". :mjlol:


Median salaries:


Software Developer: $121,000
Computer Programmer: $93,000
Registered Nurse: $77,000
Practical Nurse: $48,000
Dental Assistant: $38,000






 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
“I heard some things that he talked, about race and things that he wanted to mix into the military,” Tuberville said about Brown.

“Let me tell you something: Our military is not an equal-opportunity employer,” he said.

“We’re not looking for different groups, social justice groups,” Tuberville said. “We don’t want to single-handedly destroy our military from within."





Posters here indistinguishable from Tommy Tuberville. :mjlol:
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
15,669
Reputation
4,096
Daps
57,204
Reppin
Los Angeles
These "women and minorities will never be good enough to compete in tech" takes :mjlol:

People in 1992: "International and foreign players will never be good enough to compete in the NBA." :heh:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
These "women will never be good enough to compete in tech" takes :mjlol:

People in 1992: "International and foreign players will never be good enough to compete in the NBA." :heh:


But who really built the game, breh? Who are the GOATs? You give me your all-time Top 10 and tell me how many international players are on it. I don't care if you say international players didn't have the same opportunities before, I'm talking about FACTS.

That alone should be proof that no matter how many international players make it, they aren't really that good. Jokic, Giannis, Luka, they're just frauds propped up by rule changes and the NBA's desire to enter other markets. There are random American men playing on blacktop in Brooklyn who are better than them.
 

Rick Fox at UNC

All Star
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
5,403
Reputation
1,248
Daps
12,435
Reppin
Pretty Boys
If we're talking about employment across an entire industry, why would you reduce the conversation to a talent level that 99.9% of companies hiring will never dream of finding?

Unicorns like Niki Parmar have helped transform the entire industry, but that's neither here nor there. The random woman-hating shyt you were on was ridiculous.

Like I said, I've known plenty of women who could run circles around you. So stop trying to ride the testosterone coattails of other men who wouldn't give you the time of day.

You calling something "woman hating" and "ridiculous" doesn't make it so. Stated an observation; I stand by it.

Looks like you missed the point. I included the founder(s) of Signal, then worked my way from individual contributors all the way to datacenter techs. Doesn't have to be starting a company, can be a piece of code, or moving a cable, or even attending a conference, the ethos is the same. I noted an entire sector, a massive revenue generating operation where I cannot think of one significant female contributor (on the actual hard tech side). Not one. There are many such cases.

You keep bringing up academia and using buzzwords ("unicorn"), which leads me to believe you're either in academia, on the project management side, or simply don't work big tech at all. So what are you talking about? But we can get into academia and conferences too if you'd like.

Side note: nikka mentioning people who work the same companies I do, but believes said people will "run circles around me." Cool.

“I heard some things that he talked, about race and things that he wanted to mix into the military,” Tuberville said about Brown.

“Let me tell you something: Our military is not an equal-opportunity employer,” he said.

“We’re not looking for different groups, social justice groups,” Tuberville said. “We don’t want to single-handedly destroy our military from within."





Posters here indistinguishable from Tommy Tuberville. :mjlol:

He is correct. Lethality is the only measure the real ones (including the black real ones) care about.

None of that other shyt matters without lethality. We can get into the Intel community as well. You can be upset about people running shyt, but they RUN shyt.
 
Last edited:

Rick Fox at UNC

All Star
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
5,403
Reputation
1,248
Daps
12,435
Reppin
Pretty Boys
These "women and minorities will never be good enough to compete in tech" takes :mjlol:

People in 1992: "International and foreign players will never be good enough to compete in the NBA." :heh:

Not including "minorities," just women.

So are female hoopers of any ethnicity at the same level as male hoopers? That's the conversation right?
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
15,669
Reputation
4,096
Daps
57,204
Reppin
Los Angeles
Not including "minorities," just women.

So are female hoopers of any ethnicity at the same level as male hoopers? That's the conversation right?
Don't be dense breh. Point is the women are just getting started in tech. 30 years from now it'll most likely be significant just looking at the current industry's landscape. A lot of room to grow, which is what they're trying to do.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
You calling something "woman hating" and "ridiculous" doesn't make it so. Stated an observation; I stand by it.

Looks like you missed the point. I included the founder(s) of Signal, then worked my way from individual contributors all the way to datacenter techs.

But after the first claim, the rest were neither supported nor proved your point. You just went on a "trust me bros" rant.




Side note: nikka mentioning people who work the same companies I do,

The only woman I named was Niki Parmar, are you claiming that you work for Adept AI? Or did you work in Google Brain? Or are you just some cog in the machine at Google, trying to compare yourself to people actually making a mark in their field.

Niki Parmar came to Google Brain straight after graduation and within 2 years was at the center of one of the biggest programming breakthroughs in the last decade. What have you done?



but believes said people will "run circles around me." Cool.

Yes, I went to school with people who were among the very best in the world, programmers who win global competitions and who are among the top contributors in some of history's most elite software companies, entrepreneurs starting companies left and right, people making "I could retire now" wealth before they hit 30, and there were women holding their own right among the men. You are no more important than the average women at these companies, and you couldn't get an interview doing the shyt the women I know are doing.




He is correct. Lethality is the only measure the real ones (including the black real ones) care about.

First off, that's an idiotic take on an officer's job. "Lethality" is just a buzzword that neither represents the military's actual objectives nor does anything to describe the complex sequence of decisions and skills that allow an officer to make a positive contribution to any particular military operation. It's the sorta shyt someone says when they want to sound like the drill sergeant from Full Metal Jacket or look tough for their buddies on television cameras. It's not remotely the "only measure" you develop a good officer by.

Second, you ignored the whole fukking point that discrimination gives you a less effective workforce at every point. If you systematically fukk up your Black promotion, then you're going to end up with less effective officers, because you have systematically limited your chances to elevate Black talent. In programmer, if you systematically fukk up your recruitment of women, then you have systematically limited your chances to elevate female talent.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,555
Daps
110,441
Reppin
Bay Area
Great goalpost shift. First it was "nursing and dental assistant", now that you realized you exposed yourself, suddenly it's only specifically "RNs". :mjlol:


Median salaries:


Software Developer: $121,000
Computer Programmer: $93,000
Registered Nurse: $77,000
Practical Nurse: $48,000
Dental Assistant: $38,000






Once again you are just flat out fukking retarded. Nurses, which are every where including broke states and hospitals and you use averages. While comparing Tech salaries, which are usually only located in wealthier areas of the country.

Why not compare a San Francisco RN take home, to an average tech person ? I promise you the results might shock you... you always comparing apples and oranges like a stupid bytch. Compare in the same area :pacspit: always using some stats from wyoming or montana to try and compare to New York and California is straight weirdo behavior. You also used Software Developer and Computer Programmer, which are 2 of the higher paid salaries in Tech, which you should be comparing to Doctors or Pediatricians at that point :pacspit: because the barrier for all is about the same. Knowing damn well theirs multiple other tech jobs that dont pay that :mjlol:


here let me help you out stupid ass bytch. This is how you compare apples to apples

California is one of the highest paying states for registered nurses. The registered nurse salary in California is $125,340 per year. This means that nurses in California earn an average of $60.26 per hour.


The average salary for a Tech is $52,939 per year in California. Salaries estimates are based on 2725 salaries submitted anonymously to Glassdoor by a Tech

As of Sep 26, 2023, the average annual pay for the It jobs category in California is $102,712 a year.

The average Level 1 Technician salary in California is $41501 as of September 25, 2023, but the salary range typically falls between $33686 and $46069.


your tricks only work on stupid posters. You run and hide when presented with actual facts as always.

Dude really just tried to use national average nurse salary, which nurses are everywhere, to tech average salaries, where tech jobs are usually only in concentrated areas :laff: you are a straight fukking weirdo :laff:

here why dont you compare the crime between Oakland and some remote farm in Idaho to justify that the average crime of the nation is down or some shyt while you are at it to :laff: fukking idiot :laff:
 
Last edited:

RickyDiBiase

aka Hash Brown Hands
Bushed
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
19,164
Reputation
3,221
Daps
79,732
Reppin
Cbus
It's funny how @jilla82 shyts on Black people and protects/defends white people.

Very interesting pattern of posting. :mjpls:

“If only we could stop being such hard headed negroes and leave these poor white folk alone!”

:mjlol:Another bootlick for Justin & Kelly
 
Top