The American Press Is Destroying Itself

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
9,742
Reputation
618
Daps
28,358
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Here we go. "Colonizer fairy tales" is the basis of every black church in America. You gonna get every 60 plus black person upset lol.
Do you think a high school dropout’s opinion on quantum physics should be taken seriously?Some people’s opinions on certain topics shouldn’t matter especially when they’re basing it off of primitive dogma
 
Last edited:

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
42,654
Reputation
1,711
Daps
40,578
Reppin
NULL
Do you think a high school dropout’s opinion on quantum physics should be taken seriously?Some people’s opinions on certain topics shouldn’t matter especially when they’re basing it off of primitive dogma
That's not for you to decide. Democracy and the press is for everyone. If you prefer a monarchy or a system were only a few have power, say so.
 

Wepa Man

Ramblings Of An Angry Old Man
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,193
Reputation
1,559
Daps
25,317
I usually roll my eyes at the Right saying the Left is "anti free speech" but social media has made this a real problem on all sides of the political aisle.

Social media takes ZERO effort and allows thousands of emotional and lemming-like supporters to go after someone or an issue by retweeting or adding a hashtag. Back in the day you could go after biased reporting or crazy editorials by writing a letter to the editor or even getting a counter-editorial published that required critical thinking and writing ability. It took longer but it was more likely to endure.

I really am happy the NYT published Cotton's editorial since it showed everyone what time it was with the elite on all sides getting antsy about civil disobedience. I want these people to tell on themselves and their underlying authoritarian tendencies. I like knowing where people stand, not smiling in my face like I'm an idiot. I want eloquent Black people to refute their garbage with facts and tight logic in readable counter-editorials. That's why I enjoy @Booksnrain long ass posts :pachaha:

Saying someone should be fire for writing something, unless it is truly atrocious isn't usually a good idea. Embarrass their ideas and they will self-correct themselves or go to another echo chamber publication.
:wow:
 

Pull Up the Roots

Talking? During horse head bookends?
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
26,390
Reputation
13,857
Daps
113,623
Reppin
Detroit
I've never been a supporter of the so-called "marketplace of ideas," or believed that "having the conversation" is some neutral good in and of itself. That framing assumes people have a shared commitment to the truth or will engage in good-faith. People like Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss and other so-called heterodox thinkers are perfect examples of bad-faith actors selling themselves as persecuted truth-tellers who take advantage of this to launder narratives that would otherwise be recognized as misleading, reactionary, or rooted in elite grievance rather than reality.

Look at the article in the OP. It's a perfect example of narrative laundering. It uses a few cherry-picked incidents to reframe ordinary criticism, internal pushback, and editorial judgment as an existential threat to "free inquiry," while ignoring who actually holds power and what's actually at stake. It's the same thing they do with the college campus FREE SPEECH CRISIS!! And people need to stop falling for it.
 

DrBanneker

Space is the Place
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
6,524
Reputation
5,845
Daps
23,585
Reppin
Figthing borg at Wolf 359
I've never been a supporter of the so-called "marketplace of ideas," or believed that "having the conversation" is some neutral good in and of itself. That framing assumes people have a shared commitment to the truth or will engage in good-faith. People like Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss and other so-called heterodox thinkers are perfect examples of bad-faith actors selling themselves as persecuted truth-tellers who take advantage of this to launder narratives that would otherwise be recognized as misleading, reactionary, or rooted in elite grievance rather than reality.

Look at the article in the OP. It's a perfect example of narrative laundering. It uses a few cherry-picked incidents to reframe ordinary criticism, internal pushback, and editorial judgment as an existential threat to "free inquiry," while ignoring who actually holds power and what's actually at stake. It's the same thing they do with the college campus FREE SPEECH CRISIS!! And people need to stop falling for it.
The biggest way they tell on themselves is the fact they have never gone to the wall to defend people they disagree with from being pilloried by their own side.

The persecution narrative is all good when it is about them. But when the tables turn they are like :umad:
 
Top