Offer stands. Would love to debate you on the issues.
They aren't good. And that's the problem.Upon further research, those Georgia voting laws weren't that bad
They aren't good. And that's the problem.
It's a shame when you're shrugging off the disenfranchisement of voters as not that bad because you expected it to be worse.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...408e84-988f-11eb-a6d0-13d207aadb78_story.html
It certainly disenfranchises voters. Studies have been done over and over about the effects of voter ID laws.
It certainly disenfranchises voters. Studies have been done over and over about the effects of voter ID laws.
We experienced this here in NC already when they attempted to implement voter ID laws AND then followed it up with closing down NCDOT / DMV locations further limited peoples access to get identification.
Mind you, this election legislation is passed under the guise of fixing the unproven claims from the Big Lie.
So yes, you are shrugging your shoulders and attempting to disregard the actual harm. But you're not black, do well, and don't live in GA.
You're actually arguing it isn't bad because Republicans told you it isn't bad.
No, I think GA Republicans I acted this law to restrict voting rights in response to increasingly tightening races and unfavorable demographics in state elections. This legislation was passed as a response to losing the GA runoffs and under the guise of the big lie.
Drop boxes made voting easier? Now they want to make it more difficult. Why?
Yes, but people or they lose voter registration forms. The logic for voter ID laws is that it will prevent duplicate voters. If that's the case, then the following is unnecessary and there to suit another goal:
My original quote stated that it is merely bad. And the restriction of voting rights is bad. Just because it isn't as restrictive as they wanted doesn't mean you should shrug your shoulders are discredit the legitimate complaints people are making about voter disenfranchisement.
No, I think GA Republicans I acted this law to restrict voting rights in response to increasingly tightening races and unfavorable demographics in state elections. This legislation was passed as a response to losing the GA runoffs and under the guise of the big lie.
Again you're ignoring this point and casting it aside.
Drop boxes made voting easier? Now they want to make it more difficult. Why?
And? This is a red herring.
So you admit it was a problem and your solution is to codify the workaround as law instead of working on the fix?
What issue is it fixing? Was there some sort of illegal food distribution training elections?
Yes, but people or they lose voter registration forms. The logic for voter ID laws is that it will prevent duplicate voters. If that's the case, then the following is unnecessary and there to suit another goal:
What are you afraid of happening? And show where this has been happening.
My original quote stated that it is merely bad. And the restriction of voting rights is bad. Just because it isn't as restrictive as they wanted doesn't mean you should shrug your shoulders are discredit the legitimate complaints people are making about voter disenfranchisement.
We've gone full circle. I won't do it again.
