there is a huge difference between political outcomes and preferences.
if hillary had won a handful more votes in a few states, we wouldn't be talking about this in the US.
furthermore, i think it's a bit ham handed to try to draw parallels between countries/societies over such a long period of time. the economy of the revolutionary france bears very little resemblance, and i don't know that you can draw any logical conclusions, to the U.S., or German for that matter, economy.
finally, the one thing that we suffer from nowadays is the desire for instant gratification. changes in political, economic and social structures USUALLY take a LONG time. it is very rare when a movement is able to seize a moment that comes along once in a lifetime, and instantly reverse or change the direction. if, as we are assuming, the US has in fact been governed for the last century or so pursuant to a neoliberal consensus that places the desires of the well off in front of every one else - you would be a fool to think that this can be changed by one election or president.
these things take years - the reason the left has been failing is that they don't understand that point but the right wing does. the right wing, upon realizing/believing that the media will never give them a fair shake, set the groundwork for all of these organizations (heritage foundation, AEI, Federalist Society, etc etc) to counter that literally decades ago. Same with talk radio and other conservative media outlets. the left is all about tactics. on that I agree with you - and that is why it appears as though identity politics is the primary driving force.
I could expand but I gotta go!
good topic.