Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
youre talking about 'specifically' FBI but you're using generalized logic. now I took your own logic and applied it to any other agencies, and now you say Im not making sense
you seem to not understand logic, ie logic that is taught in math classes and philosopy classes.
again, you went ahead and said #1)The FBI is 83% white male. #2) White males support Trump over Clinton by about 25% in most polls and 3) Law enforcement people skew more conservative in their political leanings.i
and then concluded from these things that FBI is pro-trump?
I went and used your own damn logic to take any other organization, apply the same #1 and #2 and suddenly you disagree with me. so if your generalized logic can apply only to a specific case, what does say about the quality of your own damn logic beside you having double standards and clear agenda?
Did the bullshyt you just typed actually make sense in your head? You are sounding real autistic right now. I citied 1, 2, and 3 together as sound evidence to make that case that the FBI is pro-Trump.You didn't use MY logic, you retard. You made up your own logic. I didn't say 1, 2, or 3 either individually or whatever mix and match combination you made up means that the institution in question is pro-Trump. I said they all apply to the FBI and based on them we can reasonably conclude that the FBI is overwhelmingly pro-Trump.
It's called deductive reasoning. Google it.
And one again, why do you keep ignoring the fact that FBI themselves have for decades said the FBI was conservative, and agents are telling the press the FBI is mostly pro-Trump right now.
No, I told you to stick to football because you are sounding like a complete ignoramus in this thread.
lol...what the fukk are you talking about?
I don't even know what this means. You just wrapped yourself in so many layers of anti-logic I think you lost yourself at some point.But Hillary Clinton is being investigated by the FBI because she committed a probable crime which falls under the purview of the FBI. That's true. It's also true that the FBI is pro-Trump, and there are pro-Trump elements in the FBI trying to sway the election with leaks. That is not my opinion. That is unbiased fact that I'm sharing.
Except I'm simply citing facts. You are just an idiot and you are not informed on this issue. You just finished saying I called the FBI "Trumplandia" when all I did was post an article citing FBI agents, and one of them called the FBI Trumplandia. You are uninformed, didn't even read the article in the OP, and jumped in at the end of the thread saying a bunch of dumb shyt that doesn't make any sense.
No, according to reality, the FBI is mostly pro-Trump and according to the Guardian and other reporting outlets, FBI agents are saying the FBI is mostly pro-Trump and one of them called it Trumplandia.
football IS a serious topiclike Ive said, sheer arrogance and confidence again. but what utlimately dooms you in football, as well as in basketball debates and most likely on here, is your inability to stay objective enough.
Your inability to think is why you are an idiot. I haven't had a conversation with someone making as little sense as you are in this thread in a very long time. Your fight isn't with me. It's with facts.
My logic is consistent. You are just a fukking idiot and I can't help that. Yes, it's safe to assume law enforcement institutions that are comprised overwhelmingly of white males are pro-Trump.
But we're talking about the FBI who is investigating Hillary for something she did. Your argument fails at every step of the way for a variety of reasons, but one prominent one is that you tearing down this strawman of claims of persecution of Hillary which I am not making. Hillary put herself in the situation to be investigated by the FBI because of her private server actions. I never said Hillary is being investigated and persecuted by the FBI just because they're pro-Trump. She is under investigation, and now that that has occurred (because of her) there are pro-Trump elements trying to prevent her from being President? What is unreasonable or biased about that?
The only thing I did was cite facts. The FBI membership is largely pro-Trump and that pro-Trump element is leaking info to try and influence the election. You are literally against reality and you're not informed.
You should never use the word logic again in this thread or in life.but you are hesitant to do that. which brings me to the point of pointing out your logic is then useless because its specifically designed for this special case. funny enough, I dont have anything against that logic, I just feel that you dont really believe in that- and looks like Im right. in your case, you created a case of general logic that only for some reason applies to, as you say, a 'specific case'. ie, double standard.
condescending bullshyt that has as you said 'nothign to do with the topic' again. answer the yes or no question already.
Last edited:
