If restrictions on gun ownership do reduce murders, we can repeal the Second Amendment, as other Constitutional Amendments have been repealed. Laws exist to protect people. People do not exist to perpetuate laws.
But if tighter restrictions on gun ownership do not reduce murders, what is the point of tighter gun control laws — and what is the point of demonizing the National Rifle Association?
You know that argument is a total strawman right?
Murders happen , it's human nature. What people want to be able to better stop is the MASS SLAUGHTER of innocent people because a psycho got a gun, when a legit background check would have stopped him/her. Murder rate fluctuation and the factors causing this is a non issue.
Now if you want to base a study on whether gun control laws would reduce mass shootings, I am all for it. It's actually a distinction with a difference.
The problem with the US is that they are too many guns already in circulation. The horse has already bolted. Getting laws in place will have little effect now. The NRA has won.
In both England and the United States, those people most zealous for tighter gun control laws tend also to be most lenient toward criminals and most restrictive on police.
Don't lump England in the debate. Police aren't restricted, and they actually respect the rights of civilians. This a$$hole of a writer is actually implying that police should have less restrictions? When so many black men get slaughtered innocently by cops in the US?
It's quite sad that someone like Thomas Sowell decided to go fact free here. He should be ashamed. Shame on those who bought into his sleight of hand as well.
