yet the stats say you nikkas poor as fukk and losing neighborhoods by the day. But at least Fat Joe can call you a nikka
Not poorer than the South
The Hispanic takeover many are oblivious to.
- Thread starter Problematic Pat
- Start date
Not poorer than the South
poor people have been having kids since the earth has been here
its not the economy or the cost of living. Its everything I listed for single people, and for married people it's selfishness AND subtle Peter Pan Syndrome Stats also show that when couples actually become upper middle class and rich even making 600k they only want one kid.
It's the selfishness today and the love of money. Even the rich ones only ahve one kid or dont want them. It's NOT The economy.
check the study
I sit correct
Poor people have kids because they have a safety net to help, plus they have nothing better to do but fukk.
Rich people have always had less kids because they have enough money to do other shyt besides having kids.
The real issue is the middle class stopped having kids, because they earn too much to qualify for any type of assistance but not enough to raise a family. Getting married just makes everything harder.
You claim its the selfishness and love of money, but people aren't spending money on anything anymore. People aren't traveling, eating out, seeing movies, clubbing, etc because shyt just isn't affordable anymore, people are staying in the house. This economy wasn't built for a society to start families.
You claim people are stacking money and watching red pill content when most people in this country dont even have a few hundred dollars in the bank for emergencies.
@OffHalsted
The 100s LochNess
$2M for immigrant services included in City Council's $7.7M budget shuffle
$2M for immigrant services included in City Council's $7.7M budget shuffle
As President Donald Trump and his administration continues to crack down on immigration and ramp up enforcement, the Baltimore City Council pushed to allocate m
foxbaltimore.com
2 Up 2 Down
Veteran
America is becoming less white. Natural to suspect more Latinos seeing how North and South America are connected.
Your very wrong here, because uou are arguing with stats and history. Poor people AND rich people had alot of kids for centuries and millenia.
This safety net yoire talking about did not exist not too long ago and even today it does not exist in most places. Saying poor people had alot of kids because they more time too fk is intellectually lazy and wanna be classist. Especially in the old days most of their time was spent getting good and water and looking for odd jobs.
They do this, cause they have to. The ones who have been here for generations dont
(Legal) hispanics overtook us in population over 20 years ago. And that's LEGAL hispanics.
ship been sailed.
Who's "us?"
Don't try and bring up stats and history when you're trying to argue that red pill content and selfishness as the reason people aren't having as many kids.
You cant just bring up stats and pretend the information supports your conclusion. The stats and history shows that people cant afford the cost of living anymore, not that they have the money but aren't spending it like you're suggesting.
Last edited:
Your reasoning is all over the place. I would be ok if you said you disagree, but the fact that you can't comprehend how the past stats and historical facts shed light on the issue to build your disagreement on is odd and slightly depressing.
Nah, I've explained my reasoning. You're the one who's all over the place.
You're bringing up historical marriage stats and concluding that people are just being selfish with their money because of red pill bullshyt, while ignoring all the information about people being too broke to go outside.
Your stats do not support your conclusion.
As a black American whose fam is from bmore, black people arent doing shyt in bmore. It would actually make sense to make bmore a sanctuary city rather than cities like NY or Chicago because so much of the city is abandoned row houses. Hispanics will fix that shyt up and actually make it livable (hopefully).