Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in peace in palestine until the British Mandate, after that nothing was the same. (btw it was under muslim rule when it was peacefulfunny

Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in peace in palestine until the British Mandate, after that nothing was the same. (btw it was under muslim rule when it was peacefulfunny
Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in peace in palestine until the British Mandate, after that nothing was the same. (btw it was under muslim rule when it was peaceful)
Absurd historical revisionism? Lol
I made a point that when we were in control, there was peace and harmony. You disagreed. However, you havent provided any proof to the contrary. And now you're using false superiority to thwart my claim. Now if you have something of value to contribute or rebute my comment, I will entertain you. If not then stfu.
Back in the summer of 1940 and again in February 1941, al-Husseini submitted to the Nazi German Government a draft declaration of German-Arab cooperation, containing a clause:
Germany and Italy recognize the right of the Arab countries to solve the question of the Jewish elements, which exist in Palestine and in the other Arab countries, as required by the national and ethnic (völkisch) interests of the Arabs, and as the Jewish question was solved in Germany and Italy
On 20 November, al-Husseini met the German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop[153] and was officially received by Adolf Hitler on 28 November.[154] He asked Adolf Hitler for a public declaration that 'recognized and sympathized with the Arab struggles for independence and liberation, and that would support the elimination of a national Jewish homeland'
It is the duty of Muhammadans in general and Arabs in particular to … drive all Jews from Arab and Muhammadan countries….Germany is also struggling against the common foe who oppressed Arabs and Muhammadans in their different countries. It has very clearly recognized the Jews for what they are and resolved to find a definitive solution [endgültige Lösung] for the Jewish danger that will eliminate the scourge that Jews represent in the world.
rewrite history to support your religion, brehs
More from al-Husseini:
Claim harmony when leaders advocate and support the genocide of others brehs .
What you're effectively saying is that you want to go back to a time where Jews were dhimmis in the Ottoman Empire, i.e second-class citizens. They can get their little synagogue, some protection from the state if they pay their tax, but not hold any power or saying into the affairs of the state or government. Is that correct?
Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in peace in palestine until the British Mandate, after that nothing was the same. (btw it was under muslim rule when it was peaceful)
They lived in relative peace, but they were essentially held as second-class citizens. They had no true self-authority as a community. When they tried to establish self-authority, issues began to escalate. It was not harmony. Maybe we have different definitions of the word harmony. You are right in saying that it's definitely not present-day Israel/Palestine conflict, the violent is overwhelming now, but to act like it was some utopia of religious/ethnic freedom for all mankind is just as absurd friend.
Shouldn't even go back to what was or continue forward with what is. I know this is next to impossible but I keep goin back to the shyt I said in the beginning of this thread. It should just be one neutral UN administered states for all groups with neither names nor flags. UN should control things for a few generation until genuine and lasting equal governance can be be fostered.
More from al-Husseini:
Claim harmony when leaders advocate and support the genocide of others brehs .
What you're effectively saying is that you want to go back to a time where Jews were dhimmis in the Ottoman Empire, i.e second-class citizens. They can get their little synagogue, some protection from the state if they pay their tax, but not hold any power or saying into the affairs of the state or government. Is that correct?
I know what you're saying, but you have to realize minority groups always face slight discrimination anywhere. Even here in the U.S. But to have 100% discrimination, calls for genocide, etc... is different from a group that makes up less than 10% of a population not being able to hold office.
Do you realize how many zionist terrorists, and I use that word in its proper sense, not the way it is used today, were in palestine at the time killing innocents and masterminding attacks? You think our land was conquered in 1 year? I dont have to post how many terrorist attacks were orchestrated against my people in that time. And this man was against the zionism agenda, and years later he is proved to be correct in his assertion as the zionists finally took control of our country. You're acting as if we have no right to defend our country from infiltration and or conquerors. If these zionists wouldnt have invaded, would they have faced persecution? Ofcourse not. There have been jews christians and muslims living side by side for years. Go ask the palestinian jews and christians whose side they on.
Yea, a No-State Solution might be the most feasible solution besides Israel completely wiping out the Palestinian people from those lands. It's going to take reforming the concept of the security council though. The Security Council procedures and powers are extremely outdated and unfair.
The man you're defending clearly advocated the genocide of all jews. It's there in his own words.
Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in peace in palestine until the British Mandate, after that nothing was the same. (btw it was under muslim rule when it was peaceful)