The Left is too soft

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,442
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
When I read your thread title I agreed but then I read your post and was like meh.

They're too soft, but it's because the left is mostly a bunch of people that openly admit they can fend for themselves and need people brought down to their level for equality sake. No one who is successful has any business being more than moderately left, and even then it's only on select issues like the environment or abortion. It's why rich left states like Connecticut, Cali, Maryland, New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts went for Clinton over Sanders.

Being fiscally left concedes "I'm weak and I need help."

They're also too sensitive on social issues/political correctness but that's a whole other issue.

This is a lower quality post on my part here, but I just wanted to observe that your post is dumb as fukk.
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,805
When I read your thread title I agreed but then I read your post and was like meh.

They're too soft, but it's because the left is mostly a bunch of people that openly admit they can fend for themselves and need people brought down to their level for equality sake. No one who is successful has any business being more than moderately left, and even then it's only on select issues like the environment or abortion. It's why rich left states like Connecticut, Cali, Maryland, New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts went for Clinton over Sanders.

Being fiscally left concedes "I'm weak and I need help."

They're also too sensitive on social issues/political correctness but that's a whole other issue.

So a belief in economic justice is weakness?
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,740
Reputation
-998
Daps
5,345
They're not that soft. They have no problem murdering or establishing pedophilia rings.

They're evil and disgusting.

And you're foolishly caping for them. You'll see the light.
 

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
32,019
Reputation
21,819
Daps
236,254
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
st0rmfr0nt considers obama the enemy and any white candidate their idol
so their shyt is extremely polarized and binary, they either win or lose

why should black people consider either of shytty white candidates their idols ? many black democrats hate hillary and hold distaste for what the party did to bernie

for many blacks, it was lose or lose with candidates that cannot be identified with (unlike st0rmfr0nt). also, if you live in a leftist city like NYC or SF, there isnt a huge direct impact on your local life, so out of shytty two candidates you get at least one with entertainment factor of being a buffoon.

in general, theres a lot of internal problems in the left right now. still theres a lot of opposition to trump where there is party loyalty. theres always protests, letters, and shyt planned.
if there is no party loyalty, then blame people who ruined this loyalty by giving disillusionment :manny:

the best thing the left can do is clean the house by taking out the used up trash that is hillary and her posse and replacing the establishmentset with a capable fresh candidate who isnt a perennial loser and a halfway shrewd politician (aint no such thing as halfway shrewd politician).

theres also an obvious factor of left preaching tolerance as opposed to hate of the right, so it would look a bit strange if not double standard-laden if left came out saying 'kill that cac'.
Very very good points :ehh:
 

Ill Lou Malnati

Be Well.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,597
Reputation
2,803
Daps
68,575
If blacks weren't part of the left, do you think democrats would be soft? I have always believed that white democrats don't fight for us because, well, they rather us not make any substanial improvements in the quality of life department.
:ehh: Definitely would be a much softer group without blacks.
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,557
Reppin
NULL
The Left is much broader coalition of groups, there are some Democrats that are there because of union influence but would fit right in with the GOP. West Virginia Democrats in 2012 gave a felon 40% of the vote against Obama. Republicans only get to reconcile small government types and religious right. When Obama won in 2008 one of the first things the congressional and senate republicans decided to do was stonewall him and deprive him of bipartisanship victories. The Democrats on the other hand were talking about how they can work with Trump on infrastructure. Republicans didn't care if they agreed with Obama on certain issues because their aim was to just oppose for the sake of opposition he could have taken any of their policies word for word and they would still oppose it.The Tea party hated bailouts but formed after Obama even though the Bush administration had orchestrated some of the largest bailouts. If there wasn't a large black constituency for Democrats I am sure they wouldn't make as much noise about Sessions. There is also far more discord on the left in general, there aren't that many hot button issues to rile people up like on the right. I watched a Netflix documentary by Van Jones and he was in California promoting alternative energy stuff and he admitted that he wasn't going to position his views about the environment in the same way in low income communities because they need jobs.
 

NvrCMyNut

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
11,414
Reputation
-4,164
Daps
21,905
Reppin
NULL
the left have been pumelling the right since the 60's, you can't see that because the left doesn't waste time looking back they just punch forward

someone wrote that the left hasn't 'mastered fake outrage like the right' like the entire culture of modern liberalism isn't built around it:mjlol:how deluded can you be
 

VegasCAC

Leader of #CACset
Supporter
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
8,312
Reputation
2,000
Daps
42,805
Please tell me more about this justice.

And can you define it for me along with an example?

.

I could, but from seeing your posts here you aren't worth the effort.

For what its worth I do engage with Trump supporters who have at least shown a modicum of intellectual capacity. Unfortunately, you have yet to illustrate that you are worth my time to do anything other than ridicule you.

Neg pending.
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,442
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
I could, but from seeing your posts here you aren't worth the effort.

For what its worth I do engage with Trump supporters who have at least shown a modicum of intellectual capacity. Unfortunately, you have yet to illustrate that you are worth my time to do anything other than ridicule you.

Neg pending.

Bad.gif
 

el_oh_el

Bulls On Parade...
Supporter
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
10,394
Reputation
1,925
Daps
26,232
Reppin
H-Town
Wha? Only slightly racist? You mean the site which half it's posters use terms like cac and bedwench on a daily basis?
There are a bunch of racial TOPICS..but its not really fair to call the object of racial hate racist itself...in other words the Coli is only slightly racist to me due to the fact that most us are on the receiving end of racism, so of course there will be constant discussion regarding it. This is not the same as st0rmfr0nt by a long shot.

On an unrelated note: I find it extremely funny when someone negs you and they have their profile private...online equivalent to throwing rocks and hiding hands...
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,740
Reputation
-998
Daps
5,345
I could, but from seeing your posts here you aren't worth the effort.

For what its worth I do engage with Trump supporters who have at least shown a modicum of intellectual capacity. Unfortunately, you have yet to illustrate that you are worth my time to do anything other than ridicule you.

Neg pending.
Squirm boy
 
Top