The Michael Dunn Verdict (Poll)

[Ego Noir]

You don't know what you're talking about. They ruled attempted murder and firing missiles into the car against the other 3 kids because they found that they did nothing to warrant that hail of gunfire, but they felt the Davis killing was justified self defense.

But one or more of the jurors did indeed find that him killing Jordan Davis was self defense. I'm not assuming anything. Anybody who is informed and watched the case knows this. There is not one person who found him guilty that would allow the jury to be hung just because they wanted 1st degree instead of second. That makes zero sense.

The fact that some jurors bought his self defense claim is proven by the last questions they asked.



Again, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ASKED THOSE QUESTIONS ABOUT SELF DEFENSE ON SOME CHARGES AND NOT ON OTHERS UNLESS SOME JURORS RULED HE KILLED JORDAN DAVIS IN SELF DEFENSE.

So basically one of the jurors said he was defending himself by killing Jordan then said what the hell might as well kill these other kids while I'm at it

The logic of whoever this juror is, is astounding.

 

[Ego Noir]

@Ego Eimis : Maybe 1 person who voted 1st degree murder said its 1st degree or nothing?

That's what I thought breh but by the questions it seems one of the jurors was actually that stupid.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

So basically one of thejurors said he was defending himself by killing Jordan then said what the hell might as well kill these other kids while I'm at it

The logic of whoever this juror is, is astounding.

I don't think any of them were actually stupid enough to truly believe it was justifiable self defense. I think whoever that person (s) was, they were just racist. It's that simple.

 

[bright black]

You don't know what you're talking about. They ruled attempted murder and firing missiles into the car against the other 3 kids because they found that they did nothing to warrant that hail of gunfire, but they felt the Davis killing was justified self defense.

But one or more of the jurors did indeed find that him killing Jordan Davis was self defense. I'm not assuming anything. Anybody who is informed and watched the case knows this. There is not one person who found him guilty that would allow the jury to be hung just because they wanted 1st degree instead of second. That makes zero sense.

The fact that some jurors bought his self defense claim is proven by the last questions they asked.

3) If we determine deadly force is justified against one person, is it justified against the others?

Again, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ASKED THOSE QUESTIONS ABOUT SELF DEFENSE ON SOME CHARGES AND NOT ON OTHERS UNLESS SOME JURORS RULED HE KILLED JORDAN DAVIS IN SELF DEFENSE.

And the judge's answer to question 3 was no, nullifying your claim.

?!..they was about to deadlock on the attempted murder too?...

 

[LordTaskForce]

I don't think any of them were actually stupid enough to truly believe it was justifiable self defense. I think whoever that person (s) was, they were just racist. It's that simple.

Why not hold up the jury on all the charges then? Why the flip flop? Self defense is a defense for all of the charges so if a juror wanted to mess everything up he/she wouldn't have voted for the attempted murders

 

[Knicksman20]

The justice system has been setup for whites to benefit not Blacks. Black lives are not viewed the same as white lives too. Bottom line. That'll never change

 

[jadillac]

If he had killed the other kids in the car, he would have gone free. The murder charge was a mistrial. Just think about that for a minute.

what makes u say this?

 

[Knicksman20]

what makes u say this?

I believe he thinks that since they didn't convict Dunn on the 1st or 2nd degree charges, he would've walked which is probable. He got convicted on the lesser but not guilty of taking the kid Jordan's life.

 

[C-NICE]

Like a poster said FIRST degree is hard to prove and when they didn't prove it that juror probably said they made a case for first degree maybe he did have a gun but based on the facts and what we know all we know is there WAS a confrontation there WAS an exchange between davis and the defendant DAVIS isn't here to tell his side but the DUNN said that he saw a gun now it was AFTER the fact so by time the police talked to the boys in the car is it a possibility they could have had a GUN if the answer is maybe then there you go. I don't agree but the LAW IS THE LAW BREH

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Why not hold up the jury on all the charges then? Why the flip flop? Self defense is a defense for all of the charges so if a juror wanted to mess everything up he/she wouldn't have voted for the attempted murders

No it isn't. They specifically asked the judge that. The answer was no. They agreed he attempted to murder the other kids because he started dumping into the jeep and continued to as they drove off. But one or more people granted him self defense against Jordan Davis. Apparently some cacs just couldn't bring themselves to admit he murdered a "thug" for mouthing off.

 

[Ego Noir]

Like a poster said FIRST degree is hard to prove and when they didn't prove it that juror probably said they made a case for first degree maybe he did have a gun but based on the facts and what we know all we know is there WAS a confrontation there WAS an exchange between davis and the defendant DAVIS isn't here to tell his side but the DUNN said that he saw a gun now it was AFTER the fact so by time the police talked to the boys in the car is it a possibility they could have had a GUN if the answer is maybe then there you go. I don't agree but the LAW IS THE LAW BREH

 

[Chrishaune]

No it isn't. They specifically asked the judge that. The answer was no. They agreed he attempted to murder the other kids because he started dumping into the jeep and continued to as they drove off. But one or more people granted him self defense against Jordan Davis. Apparently some cacs just couldn't bring themselves to admit he murdered a "thug" for mouthing off.

That's a shame.........but we knew that's how a lot of them think anyway........We already know as black men people are looking for reasons to put us down anyway, so we have to stick together........brehs need to stop putting down our black women too, who are going through similar.

 

[jadillac]

I believe he thinks that since they didn't convict Dunn on the 1st or 2nd degree charges, he would've walked which is probable. He got convicted on the lesser but not guilty of taking the kid Jordan's life.

If he had killed 3-4 unarmed kids in a truck, I dont see how there's any way he would've walked.

 

[LordTaskForce]

No it isn't. They specifically asked the judge that. The answer was no. They agreed he attempted to murder the other kids because he started dumping into the jeep and continued to as they drove off. But one or more people granted him self defense against Jordan Davis. Apparently some cacs just couldn't bring themselves to admit he murdered a "thug" for mouthing off.

To clarify, self defense is a defense for attempted murder* That being said, you would think the juror would have blocked all the other charges. Either way that jurors reasoning doesn't make much sense

 

[Knicksman20]

If he had killed 3-4 unarmed kids in a truck, I dont see how there's any way he would've walked.

You'd hope that but look what just happened. Dunn took that kids life & they couldn't convict him on that alone. Some juror(s) held out for self defense for that guy. That mentality got so many of his skin color off with murder.