And rightfully so as his coverage was terrible and took away from the event.
Both he and ESPN need to realize that less is more and that he doesn't need to be involved in EVERY nba happening.
Entertainment. Believe it or not, there are people who find him entertaining...So what does he add?
I stopped watching First Take in the late 2010s, somewhere around 2018, give or take a year. That's really when I stopped watching ESPN programming too, besides some NFL and college football games and programming here and there...People hate the man but yet he stay getting millions. I don’t understand.
I stopped watching him when Kellerman stepped in because I was getting triggered by all that yelling. shyt felt like domestic violence to me. You got to turn that man off and make it easy for espn to get rid of him. There’s a reason he keeps getting paid.. you can help change that![]()
Don't just blame the dealer blame the fiend.
The reason we know the names Skip and SAS is because they got ratings. People complain about the damage they did in the media but people kept viewing it every year. Even now some of yall know what SAS says because you still watch him on a regular basis. ESPN cares about selling marketing not the quality of sport coverage.
This is like people who buy Madden complaining its a trash game every year. Of course it is. You keep buying the trash then wonder why they won't change it.
First Take isn't the issue or the problem. It's that they keep insisting on trotting him on other NBA coverage where he adds nothing of value and his schtick gets overexposed.That tweet has zero likes. I 100% agree with the article but it's the tree falling in the woods. First Take is still bringing in ratings and SAS can still go viral with ease so he's not going anywhere.
Didn't he just get a raise?
First Take isn't the issue or the problem. It's that they keep insisting on trotting him on other NBA coverage where he adds nothing of value and his schtick gets overexposed.
He added nothing to the draft coverage last year and instead took away from it.
Is it really on SAS though or the Cooper Flagg effectIf the ratings are up with him on the show then yes he did
People think their hate for SAS matters more than the bottom line. ESPN only cares about numbers so if SAS gets an increase in viewership they're going to put him on everything possible. They'll put that man on the coverage team for the Westminster Dog Show if there's an uptick in viewers.
Is it really on SAS though or the Cooper Flagg effect
He added nothing to the draft coverage last year and instead took away from it.
It’s this simple.^If the ratings are up with him on the show then yes he did
People think their hate for SAS matters more than the bottom line. ESPN only cares about numbers so if SAS gets an increase in viewership they're going to put him on everything possible. They'll put that man on the coverage team for the Westminster Dog Show if there's an uptick in viewers.
I meant this year as I was watching him on ABC since I don't have ESPN
It’s this simple.^
ESPN have had so many layoffs. If they thought he was a problem he’d be apart of them… he just keep getting paid though.
People will clown him for some shyt he did Monday, then share some cool or funny shyt about him on Tuesday, like his daughter popping out to act like him. It wouldn’t shock me if he’s the one behind that shyt l. Have good or funny news in the fukk once people stuffy taking negative about him,
Just because you like him don’t mean everyone else does. If we watching NBA games on ESPN, we can’t turn elsewhwre since he all over their coverage.