The Official 2012 London Olympics Thread
- Thread starter Gilver
- Start date
- Status
Real
Location: Under Your Skin
I'm a fakkit.
And my a$$hole just got annihilated
fixed
Last edited by a moderator:
what kind of bullshyt is that? LOL
By that criteria, Grenada would lead the medal stand (pop. 110,000)
Try harder... How about GDP or number of cups of tea or yellow teeth too?
USA = 1 Gold Medal per approx 7 million people.
UK = 1 Gold medal per approx 2.4 million people.
It's an annihilation
Your logic is just something that loser countries use to justify never having the top medal spot. So you are telling me that the uk would have 3 gold medals per 7.2 million people if it had a similar size to the U.S just because that's how it works out in your formula? Haha keep living in that fantasy world mate I'm sure that makes you feel alot better after looking at the medal standings and seeing the U.S with the top spot.
Lewis Black
Superstar
Kunty Mcphuck aint got nothing witty to say either nah?
.......
nah? lol
.......
nah? lol
Went to the Womens football bronze medal game today, the organisation of the whole thing was top notch. Atmosphere was a bit weird but on the whole a really good day.
Canada performing a snatch and grab with the win, didn't deserve it at all.
Canada performing a snatch and grab with the win, didn't deserve it at all.
Kunty McPhuck
Scust Szn has Returned
Kunty Mcphuck aint got nothing witty to say either nah?
.......
nah? lol
They all weak troll attempts, atleast you think im witty, silver linings and all that
Grams
Grams Grands Gucci G'd Up
How's that?
It's much more accurate guide than athletes at the games which is massively skewed by the fact that we entered in to every sport as we're hosts, sports we've never competed in, or haven't for decades. Teams/Squads which had no realistic chance of even winning a game, let alone a medal. We entered just over 300 in the beijing games, which is a far more accurate number.
Let's not even get in to the fact that the US pumps money from a bottomless pit in to their olympic programs.
In the UK funding for a sport is only achieved based on the success in that sport, which is a retarded system but there you go. Do you know where that funding comes from? No not the government, not private investors, but from the national lottery fund.
Considering these factors the UK, at 3rd in the table is punching MASSIVELY above it's weight and is having a much better games than the USA.
You can all choose to ignore this stuff if you want, and you can all post as many US>UK stuff as you like, but you ALL know what i'm saying is true, but your american arrogance won't let you admit it.
Britain
Pound for pound kings
Lewis Black
Superstar
They all weak troll attempts, atleast you think im witty, silver linings and all that
You a yellow teeth tea sippin faguex but ill admit, your wittyness is top notch. You, gilver, emoney, bobn all learnt a valuable lesson these past two weeks.
Your logic is just something that loser countries use to justify never having the top medal spot. So you are telling me that the uk would have 3 gold medals per 7.2 million people if it had a similar size to the U.S just because that's how it works out in your formula? Haha keep living in that fantasy world mate I'm sure that makes you feel alot better after looking at the medal standings and seeing the U.S with the top spot.
If the UK had 300 million people, and funded our olympic sports in the same way the US has over the years, we'd be absolutely running away with it in the medal table.
It's frankly embarrassing for you that we're as close as we are.
If France takes 25 shots and don't score on any of them do they deserve to win?
France were all over them, Canada were really really poor. Canada didn't really do a great deal to deserve the win, not a lot of great defending/attacking. They didn't do much to earn the win, basically relied on France's bad luck/lack of finishing.
- Status