If we take Monk at 3 just fire Colangelo the next day.
Don't get how so many people have the Sixers taking Monk over Jackson
In a league like the NBA unless you're on on the verge of contention always take bpa over need
Jackson is such a superior player to Monk u take him and figure it out later
Jackson on the Sixers makes absolutely no sense.
Jackson is the BPA at 3, take him then sign some shooters in the offseason.Jackson on the Sixers makes absolutely no sense.
You know what makes less sense? Drafting the next Lou Williams/Ben Gordon over a potential superstar in Jackson because it fits a need
Jackson on the Sixers makes absolutely no sense.
Jackson is a fit for them he is a 2 way player and can slide in at any position between the 2-4 at times...He's a dog all the way his jumper is shaky but his percentages weren't bad he's clearly a top 3 talent and an argument could be made as for him being a top 2 talent....You don't pass on a guy like that because of fit...
Now playing the devils advocate if the Suns/Kings want to make a trade for him and select Monk/Fox for the 76ers and add an additional asset I would trade it.

im all in on the Bulls blowing it up at the draft(dont undersell though just to do it), love Jimmy but need to be real about the situation
im guessing the Celtics stay the course though, they are in such a great position regardless how they proceed
would Philly or Phoenix make a compelling Jimmy trade though? thoughts?
Well I mean its not like he has a no trade clauseI don't know if he'd go there but Philly has a sh1tload of assets to give you in terms of young players and future picks
And for them they'd be able to keep enough of a core to surround Butler that it makes sense for them.
It's a perfect match for both teams just not sure if he wants to go there