AnonymityX1000
Veteran
But to say no one watches it when it beats most of the shows you listed was misleading.Not to mention the fact that Gotham and Supergirl go HEAD TO HEAD and both STILL get higher ratings than Agents of Shield speaks volumes.
But to say no one watches it when it beats most of the shows you listed was misleading.Not to mention the fact that Gotham and Supergirl go HEAD TO HEAD and both STILL get higher ratings than Agents of Shield speaks volumes.

JUST SEND HIM QUESTIONS... fukk HIS FEELINGSone of my cousins was at the screening for this at radio city music hall..im trying to get him tell me how it is but he's slackin on responding back to me in a timely manner![]()

2 huges really? What are the consequences besides being more popular?Yeah if any show on the CW beats a show on abc or fox or cbs that's a huge huge problem
2 huges really? What are the consequences besides being more popular?
OK but you said it was a huge huge problem. Why? It's not like Shield is getting cancelled over it.No breh it's the fact that the CW is in far less households and doesn't have as big of a market share. Like not even close as big of a market share as abc or fox or nbc or cbs. Which is why their big ratings differ from what cbs or abc would consider big ratings. Their threshold is different so their expectations are different as are their costs
OK but you said it was a huge huge problem. Why? It's not like Shield is getting cancelled over it.
I didn't say it like it was a huge problem breh, that's how you interpreted it. I was just stating facts that a CW show shouldn't beat a show on a bigger network just based on the amount of households there in. I didn't even know shield doesn't get the numbers that flash does. But I'm not into the show so I don't pay attention to its stats like that.
Yeah if any show on the CW beats a show on abc or fox or cbs that's a huge huge problem
Yeah you did. But I get your point.
Not saying it was a diss, just saying you described it as if it had consequences when it doesn't, 'a huge huge problem' infers the need for solutions no?Ah so you're speaking for me again. If telling you that it wasn't a diss then it's not a diss. If it was a diss I'd make it a diss. Why would I diss a show I don't care about and have no knowledge of except that it exists?
Like that will ever happenThis shyt is hilarious...I will start migrating over here when the fukkery is low in TLR.

Get revenge for what. Zod only wanted the codex. Superman could've easily negotiated but was too awkward/dumb to do it. Russell Crowe and Zod wanted the same damn thing only Crowe was pro natural birth and Zod was pro tradition. Crowe was more of an outlaw than Zodhe was reckless as fukk. He put the codex inside of superman as a baby and said fukk it if he somehow didn't even make the trip. And how come Crowe new about earth but not Zod
That movie had so many plot holes I can make a do documentary about it. And the main REASON why we have all of these characters on BvS is because superman or this version of superman can't carry a movie by himself.



Not saying it was a diss, just saying you described it as if it had consequences when it doesn't, 'a huge huge problem' infers the need for solutions no?
Your logic is horrible , killing Zod makes sense in the universe they are creating . They could of went other routes but to me it makes the best sense to have supermanZod was created for the sole purpose of preserving krypton. Hell, his own people didn't listen to him which is why the planet died in the first place.
Superman didn't even try to reason with him. When Zod first met him he was on some :melo:
If Russell Crowe wasn't shoehorned back into the plot Zod wouldve gotten a sequel and I could stillat Faora. They took that from me
Superman is worse because he killed off ALL of his people trying to simp over a bytch and protect humans that who constantly bullied him and a military that was trying to kill him even as he was fighting Zod's goons.
All I'm saying is they could've gone a different route. They clearly didn't plan on making a DC cinematic universe when they made this movie and as a result we miss out on what could've been a dope sequel.
It's almost as bad as Heath Ledger dying and DC not able to use his version of the Joker in future sequels.
Smh she's always been strong and a part of the trinity plus been a hero longer than batman and superman been aliveOh oh don't tell me ww is going to be another rey
You didn't even see the movie and what losses do the trinity really take ? Outside of batman noneNikita was the title character in la femme nikita and she took loses, Sydney Bristow was the title character in alias and she took loses. Hell Ripley from alien franchise took loses, I don't understand this bullshyt that's being understood amongst pop culture that every heroine has to be impervious to losses and be perfect