nikkas need to stop with the Canelo impressed vs Trout bullshyt he won 4 clear rounds thats it
How can you make an assessment on a fighter from a fight 66% of boxing experts felt he lost, a fight where vanilla ass Trout had to abandon his jab and come in reckless because of the open scoring bullshyt which caused him to get knockdown, a fight where Canelo fat ass was sucking wind after 2 like it was his first time in the gym, a fight where the ginger resorted to getting on his bycyle after getting his head boxed off because he knew he would be awarded round after round and the decision no matter what..............
It's all good Floyd and Canelo weight difference isnt as much as televised according to the pics, the ginger would get his soon![]()
That fight was a perfect example of a fighter doing better than what most people expected so their performance gets exaggerated. At best that fight could have been a draw. I'm starting to wonder if the Canelo/Floyd fight looks similar to Canelo/Trout (Floyd getting dropped, but using his ring generalship to win most of the rds) will nikkas say Floyd got robbed or that Canelo impressed again. Cuz nikkas weren't trying to hear that Trout got robbed.
I don't see the Hopkins/Taylor comparisons either since...
Taylor's skills and talent >> Canelo's skills and talent. Both got stamina issues, but at least Taylor can give you 8 or 9 hard rounds. Canelo be hard pressed to give you 5 or 6 good rounds.
Besides just imagine if Taylor and Floyd were able to fight each other at 154 with no problems just for the sake of argument. You can't tell me that Taylor wouldn't be a more difficult opponent than Canelo. His jab alone along with his size would be a tall order.






Floyd's a 2 x Jr middle champ.

but breh you fukking suck at it...you not even on Tdubb hit N run style level


