don't forget about barrels becoming controlled items, naturally cops are exempt from both that and the glock ban
"nobody wants to take away your guns" was always a lie, now it's a clear as day lie that no self-styled "liberal" can be taken seriously for saying
As of next year, you would have to buy barrels at a FFL and do a background check
. No more shipping to your place of residence.
I'm all in for gun safety and control but some of these laws are just about deterring gun ownership in general. We already have to do a 10 day wait period, background checks on ammo, extra 11% tax on all guns and ammo purchases, limited handgun options because of the roster, no magazines over 10 rounds, no suppressors, only fixed or featureless options for AR/AKs and PCCs are non-existent because CA bans them for the most part
. I don't shoot as much like I want to but I would at least have the same options like the majority of the country.
Also the background check for ammo was overturned a few months ago but the state appealed for another option so that is still active for now.
. Right now, only the gen 3 versions are only available because they were grandfather in before the handgun roster was implemented. Either Glock finally makes a CA version of their guns (loaded chamber indicator & magazine disconnect, along with a another trigger setup) or they can no longer be sold in the state after Jan 1 (FFLs can still sell after that date as long they had them in stock beforehand). Glock is most likely going to leave the market like other manufacturers because CA laws are too stringent.
