The Official Hip Hop Grammy's 2014 Thread

Will Kendrick Lamar Win Album Of The Year?

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 45.5%
  • No

    Votes: 54 54.5%

  • Total voters
    99
  • Poll closed .

Medio

All Star
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
4,022
Reputation
85
Daps
6,817
Reppin
New York
I love we talk about on the coli and other forums how the grammy's dont mean shyt but yet we have a sticky thread. If we really don't want to care about the grammys unsticky this fukking thread. They don't care about hip hop.
 

Kaypain

#SuicideGang
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
35,701
Reputation
9,301
Daps
95,295
Side note but It'd be really dope if Kendrick performed Compton with Dre at the Grammy's. Especially if he wins, it would be historic
Actually I was thinking maybe he perform bytch Don't Kill My Vibe

with Lady Gaga singing the Hook or another RnB artist

But let him spit his first verse from the original song

and let Jay Z come out of no where and spit his remix verse

yeah that would be dope
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
86,268
Reputation
-13,804
Daps
135,945
Actually I was thinking maybe he perform bytch Don't Kill My Vibe

with Lady Gaga singing the Hook or another RnB artist

But let him spit his first verse from the original song

and let Jay Z come out of no where and spit his remix verse

yeah that would be dope
or how about he make some new music
 

MiC

Pro
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
2,524
Reputation
-420
Daps
2,070
I think kendrick jay and macklemore will be the only rappers performing...which really is not much
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,212
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,223
Grantland agrees with your perspective




"What if “Same Love” does win Song of the Year? How significant will it be? Will it really mean anything?

I’m tempted to say it won’t be significant at all, because deep down I don’t think award shows (least of all the Grammys) ultimately shape how the history of art forms are remembered. That “Hey Ya!” didn’t win Record of the Year obviously hasn’t affected the love people have for it. (As much as I like “Clocks,” it probably won’t outlive “Lose Yourself” or “Crazy in Love,” either.) “Jesus Walks” is better regarded today than John Mayer’s “Daughters,” even though the latter beat the former for Song of the Year in 2005. Jay Z has as many Song of the Year nominations as Hoobastank,10 and yet Jay Z could pay to have the members of Hoobastank dropped into a South American rain forest and hunted like wild game by billionaires. This is as it should be. Awards never stick around as long as truly great music does."

http://grantland.com/features/lies-grammy-told-us/

Exactly, we're in a world where people are influenced by other cultural factors much more than Grammy winners. People will go into those awards thinking their guy should win and if they don't, they'll :smh: and move on. That's just life.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
70,159
Reputation
31,769
Daps
414,859
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
Exactly, we're in a world where people are influenced by other cultural factors much more than Grammy winners. People will go into those awards thinking their guy should win and if they don't, they'll :smh: and move on. That's just life.


However lets say for the sake of argument that there is a BIT of a truth in that the Grammy's honoring rap artists in the AOTY category has some influence in the changing climate. I agree that artists are going to do what they want and what they feel, however, whether or not their artistic expression is taken seriously and given the push they they need to reach a higher platform is predicated by the success of those who came before ( at least to some degree) Outkast winning AOTY in 2004 for Speakerboxx/Love Below it can be argued helped an artist such as Kanye West, with his non-gangsta image and hipster appeal, be taken seriously enough to release his debut, College Dropout. Not that the sounds of the albums are sonically the same, but Kanye was given the platform to crossover while retaining artistic credibility ( as was Outkast). Kanye's success and further mainstream recognition in turn gave birth DIRECTLY to artists such as Drake, ASAP Rocky, and J.Cole (all recent Grammy nominees) as well as Kendrick Lamar.

I'm not saying that this is the ONLY reason why these artists attain mainstream success I'm just saying it's a possible reason. It's also why I was upset at Nas getting snubbed last year (and in specific categories like Best Rap Song Vs. Best Rap Performance) as the mainstream's portrayal of who is deserving and who isn't speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding of the genre as a whole, which can have disastrous after effects
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,985
Daps
25,316
Why is it we never campaign for rappers who appeal to the hood over those that appeal to these "real hip hop" posing cacs when it comes to grammys :leostare:

And @Ziggiy Jay winning for nikkaz in Paris is not a misunderstanding or perpetuating one..unless u are forgetting where aand what was one of the original purposes of hip hop
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,212
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,223
However lets say for the sake of argument that there is a BIT of a truth in that the Grammy's honoring rap artists in the AOTY category has some influence in the changing climate. I agree that artists are going to do what they want and what they feel, however, whether or not their artistic expression is taken seriously and given the push they they need to reach a higher platform is predicated by the success of those who came before ( at least to some degree) Outkast winning AOTY in 2004 for Speakerboxx/Love Below it can be argued helped an artist such as Kanye West, with his non-gangsta image and hipster appeal, be taken seriously enough to release his debut, College Dropout. Not that the sounds of the albums are sonically the same, but Kanye was given the platform to crossover while retaining artistic credibility ( as was Outkast). Kanye's success and further mainstream recognition in turn gave birth DIRECTLY to artists such as Drake, ASAP Rocky, and J.Cole (all recent Grammy nominees) as well as Kendrick Lamar.
The College Dropout was largely crafted prior to Outkast winning. His Rocafella co-sign and subsequent commercial success are what lead to his stature after College Dropout. If not for the Rocafella co-sign, and the push they gave him, combined with how good his musically actually was--he would just be another underground rapper. He would've not gotten past where Little Brother was (potentially). Jesus Walks would not have made it onto radio (almost certainly). Kanye West was slighted for best new artist, but did win rap album of the year. He eventually came to influence this entire new generation because they, and the public as a whole, embraced him. It was not because of Grammys or any other award. We knew more about him complaining about what he didn't win than what he did win. The entity that he became did breed these new emcees, but they were already disaffected by what they saw in the mainstream to some degree. He connected to something in them that was already there waiting to come out, and it resonated with me too but I saw that it did not resonate with my cousin right next to me.


I'm not saying that this is the ONLY reason why these artists attain mainstream success I'm just saying it's a possible reason. It's also why I was upset at Nas getting snubbed last year (and in specific categories like Best Rap Song Vs. Best Rap Performance) as the mainstream's portrayal of who is deserving and who isn't speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding of the genre as a whole, which can have disastrous after effects

An award may very well bring you more attention, it definitely brought attention to 3 6 Mafia after the Oscars but let's not go overboard. The attention lasts only as long as you continue to produce something the public wants. The public and artists will choose whether or not they want to be inspired by Kendrick, the awards won't dictate that. Now, a continuous cycle of certain types of songs winning in different rap categories can fundamentally change what we consider to be award-winning music. That is true, but that is true of anything. That is where the term "Oscar bait" comes from. It's based on the type of performances that have won in the past. One win is unlikely to do anything (outside a variety of various circumstances more related to coverage than the music),and, you're probably equally as likely to receive backlash from people saying that the media doesn't understand where they're coming from. and is overlooking them.

As for your problem with best rap song vs. best rap performance you were wrong last year and I told you why. You hoped your understanding of what the awards should mean (influenced substantially by your love of Nas and rappers of his ilk) would be mirrored by the Grammys. It never has. You failed to recognize that best rap performance had almost always gone to an "anthem," like I said. It was CLEAR that "In Paris" would win. History said that. So, yes the Grammys do frequently fail to pay lyricists in hip hop their due but they did not "get it wrong" according to their standards. They picked who they always pick for that award, you just hoped that for once it would mean something different. I mean Nelly's "Hot In Here" won that award before over "Song Cry" you couldn't possibly think it meant anything else but that. Given that, I don't see how Drake or Macklemore don't win this year.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
70,159
Reputation
31,769
Daps
414,859
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
The College Dropout was largely crafted prior to Outkast winning. His Rocafella co-sign and subsequent commercial success are what lead to his stature after College Dropout. If not for the Rocafella co-sign, and the push they gave him, combined with how good his musically actually was--he would just be another underground rapper. He would've not gotten past where Little Brother was (potentially). Jesus Walks would not have made it onto radio (almost certainly). Kanye West was slighted for best new artist, but did win rap album of the year. He eventually came to influence this entire new generation because they, and the public as a whole, embraced him. It was not because of Grammys or any other award. We knew more about him complaining about what he didn't win than what he did win. The entity that he became did breed these new emcees, but they were already disaffected by what they saw in the mainstream to some degree. He connected to something in them that was already there waiting to come out, and it resonated with me too but I saw that it did not resonate with my cousin right next to me.




An award may very well bring you more attention, it definitely brought attention to 3 6 Mafia after the Oscars but let's not go overboard. The attention lasts only as long as you continue to produce something the public wants. The public and artists will choose whether or not they want to be inspired by Kendrick, the awards won't dictate that. Now, a continuous cycle of certain types of songs winning in different rap categories can fundamentally change what we consider to be award-winning music. That is true, but that is true of anything. That is where the term "Oscar bait" comes from. It's based on the type of performances that have won in the past. One win is unlikely to do anything (outside a variety of various circumstances more related to coverage than the music),and, you're probably equally as likely to receive backlash from people saying that the media doesn't understand where they're coming from. and is overlooking them.

As for your problem with best rap song vs. best rap performance you were wrong last year and I told you why. You hoped your understanding of what the awards should mean (influenced substantially by your love of Nas and rappers of his ilk) would be mirrored by the Grammys. It never has. You failed to recognize that best rap performance had almost always gone to an "anthem," like I said. It was CLEAR that "In Paris" would win. History said that. So, yes the Grammys do frequently fail to pay lyricists in hip hop their due but they did not "get it wrong" according to their standards. They picked who they always pick for that award, you just hoped that for once it would mean something different. I mean Nelly's "Hot In Here" won that award before over "Song Cry" you couldn't possibly think it meant anything else but that. Given that, I don't see how Drake or Macklemore don't win this year.


But again, and we had this conversation last year, my issue wasn't that NIP won rap performance, it certainly deserved that, my issue was that it didn't deserve Best Rap SONG over Daughters and that the Grammy's failure of distinction is the overall problem. Remember Best Rap Song is the writer's award whereas rap performance is for the overall performance of the song. nikkaz In Paris is an anthem that can be performed 12 straight times during a concert and he crowd loses their mines every time, Daughters is a thoughtful, poignant song with an original message and theme that was expertly crafted and written. Hip Hop is a diverse genre and if the Grammy's saw fit to include that distinction in their categories then it only makes sense that they would in turn do so for the winners
 
Top