Because he fukin sucks and shows no sign of improvement. I honestly do not know how he made it to UFC level.He also hasnt had an exciting fight since the one he subbed a dude
In saying that ufc have always had a different set of rules for white l&ps and black l&ps.I mean u know something is up when rashad aint getting no love
All these fighters have a lot of UD/SD to their name.And most of their high profile fights "in the ufc" have been primarily sparring matches.You want to harp about WEC? K.But I already stated the lack of depth magnifies these results the more.You are just arguing for arguing sake.To say torres (since bowles served him) hasnt been a point fighter is hilarious
Again I already clearly explained the type of style of fights that fuels this argument u want to plead ignorance![]()
its like someone saying clay guida has boring fights and my retort being not when he loses.Translation if a fight isnt going guida's way and its a barnburner rest assured hes going to lose.U say Faber is a finisher my retort being not when he loses.Translation in his last 3 high profile fights when he coulnt finish it went to a decision and he lost
![]()
And by saying a 12-1 Phil Davis sucks you have absolutely no fukking clue what you're talking about.
- Faber: NOT a decision magnet
- Torres: NOT a decision magnet
- Benavidez: NOT a decision magnet
- Mighty Mouse: has finished 60% of his fights (He's had more FINISHES than decisions), therefore you cannot call him a decision magnet.

Josh Neer (33-11-1) vs. Justin Edwards (7-2)
i think the only semi reach he made was benavidez, ben actually fights and tries to finish. otherwise i look at that list and them guys are decisions dogs. at least thats what i expect from them nowadays. these are smaller guys though...
@ phillycavsfan - it doesnt make sense. they put him on the undercard after he fought rashad too![]()
or it just flew over your headWhile you explained it clearly, it was still dumb and unnecessary
u do know ufc is geared towards wrestlers right? if that is your main skill & u happen to be pretty good at it the wins will keep coming. Who has he really faced other than rashad any how? stann?And by saying a 12-1 Phil Davis sucks you have absolutely no fukking clue what you're talking about.
gustaffon who is not only overated but the jury is still out on on? 
Who has he really faced other than rashad any how? stann?gustaffon who is not only overated but the jury is still out on on?
![]()
or it just flew over your headu do know ufc is geared towards wrestlers right? if that is your main skill & u happen to be pretty good at it the wins will keep coming. Who has he really faced other than rashad any how? stann?
gustaffon who is not only overated but the jury is still out on on?
![]()
ExplainI'm going to leave some finishes [subs] by Faber that NEVER HAPPENED:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All these fighters have a lot of UD/SD to their name.And most of their high profile fights "in the ufc" have been primarily sparring matches.You want to harp about WEC? K.But I already stated the lack of depth magnifies these results the more.You are just arguing for arguing sake.To say torres (since bowles served him) hasnt been a point fighter is hilarious
Erm because in north america mma is fought in a cage.Which is a grappler/l&ps wet dream?Explain

Any one can win but its how u win (and who u beat) that determines how good/respected you will be.Case in point jon fitch, u take away all the white pride nonsense during his streak and no one gave a damn for the simple fact nearly all his wins were won in that risk averse style.Which too many isnt sporting despite being within the rules..To davis credit he has some subs but that was 2 yrs ago.Now that hes been thrusted into the deepend hes shown no growth and seems pretty gumby out there.@philly If you want to rate that W over lil nog as something of meritAnd using your logic, he should be good then right?
but I think that fight underlines my argument on why he sux
You are probably one of those cats that was doing cartwheels when forrest subbed shogun right? I am sorry but when a fighter has been on hiatus for over a year I dont rate their performances the 1st fight back.Zuffa knew what they were doing but if that fight has u buying stock on gustaffson good for you.But I need to see moreThe jury's not out on anything concerning Gustaffson; he's widely seen as a potential title contender and destroyed Thiago Silva (gatekeeper) in his last fight.
Erm because in north america mma is fought in a cage.Which is a gappler/l&ps wet dream?
Any one can win but its how u win (and who u beat) that determines how good/respected you will be.Case in point jon fitch, u take away all the white pride nonsense during his streak and no one gave a damn for the simple fact nearly all his wins were won in that risk averse style.Which too many isnt sporting despite being within the rules..To davis credit he has some subs but that was 2 yrs ago.Now that hes been thrusted into the deepend hes shown no growth and seems pretty gumby out there
I hate this style of retorting its a classic case of a dude on his heels.Where do I ever claim ufc hire judges? u just placed that their to anchor your argumentI do agree with the problem with the l&p fighters..But the judges arent hired by the UFC..so you can go elsewhere with that condescending tone breh. Wrestling is the best skill you can have because it allows you to take your opponent down and control them.
Its up to the commisions to get better judges and then we wont see this shyt anymore.
. I just stated if u are in north america and wrestling is your base you dont really need much striking/jitz cuz stalling will suffice.