who will win french open

  • nadal

    Votes: 72 38.9%
  • joker

    Votes: 59 31.9%
  • roger

    Votes: 26 14.1%
  • other

    Votes: 28 15.1%

  • Total voters
    185

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
34,327
Reputation
6,735
Daps
52,806
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Laugh all you want but thats the truth.

You think Federer dominated the toughest era? 13 of his slams have been won against players other than the big four and his first five were won against lesser players.

Djokovic has been far more dominant than Federer and has the titles and achievements to back it up.

more babble :mjlol:

the man said: "Federer would be on 25-26 majors if Novak wasn't around"

while ignoring: "Federer would be on far more majors if Nadal wasn't around"

it's reductive piecemeal nonsense and a danger to functioning braincells
 

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
2,031
Reputation
270
Daps
7,906
more babble :mjlol:

the man said: "Federer would be on 25-26 majors if Novak wasn't around"

while ignoring: "Federer would be on far more majors if Nadal wasn't around"

it's reductive piecemeal nonsense and a danger to functioning braincells
He also said Federer didn't fall of a cliff but rather Djokovic just got better and Federer couldn't match him which is true.
 

LiveFromLondon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
8,407
Reputation
615
Daps
19,540
Djokovic has dominated the toughest era in mens tennis :mjtf:
This section always scoffs at this as if this hasn't been the big 3/4 era where Djokovic has dominated. They like to point at Fed being old but fail to realise he was a playing his best Tennis between 29-33 and widely accepted to. He would beat Nadal and it be:blessed:fed fed fed, but loses to Djokovic its he's old:rudy:
 

Black Bolt

Superstar
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
6,150
Reputation
655
Daps
15,820
Reppin
LDN
Federer had it the easiest out of the 3, this shouldn’t really be argued. They all sharpened each other tho.

I feel more for someone like Murray or to a. far lesser extent Wawrinka & Delpo who’d have 2-5 Slams more but for playing vs the 3 goats in their primes
 

Black Bolt

Superstar
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
6,150
Reputation
655
Daps
15,820
Reppin
LDN
It took way too long for Fed to adapt to Nadal’s targeted BH strat ( see Wawrinka for comp) and by the time he did he then couldn’t handle Djoko’s consistency and intensity (tho those two had the best battles out of the 3 IMO)
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
34,327
Reputation
6,735
Daps
52,806
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
He also said Federer didn't fall of a cliff but rather Djokovic just got better and Federer couldn't match him which is true.

a5vaIXz.png
 
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,034
Reputation
1,809
Daps
42,571
more babble :mjlol:

the man said: "Federer would be on 25-26 majors if Novak wasn't around"

while ignoring: "Federer would be on far more majors if Nadal wasn't around"

it's reductive piecemeal nonsense and a danger to functioning braincells

Nadal and Federer were both winning multiples and Novak came and crushed the buildings. Only man to beat Nadal twice at FO :wow:

I love Fed but it's crazy to not consider Novak the GOAT.

Novak is the one player Rafa and Fed hate to play as they couldn't dominate him like others. It takes everything from them to remove him usually, outside of FO for Nadal which he whoops everyone.... until recently:jawalrus:
 
Top