who will win french open

  • nadal

    Votes: 72 38.9%
  • joker

    Votes: 59 31.9%
  • roger

    Votes: 26 14.1%
  • other

    Votes: 28 15.1%

  • Total voters
    185

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,077
Reputation
5,584
Daps
30,901
:wtf:

Borg won 5 wimbledons and 4 straight at FO and Wimby. 4 2nd place finishes at US Open and only played AUS once cuz he didnt feel like it. He won 83% of his W-L, 90% of matches in GS's and 41% of all GS's entered. Won 3-4 GS's without losing a set and he retired at 26 to pimp hoes.

Watch your slander of the Ice Man. :ufdup:He's a GOAT candidate.
I was not throwing shade at Bjorn and I know his resume. I was simply stating that from a pure statistical point of view, Nadal winning 9 of his 14 slams is comparable to other greats and that can't be used against him. I mean Sampras was considered the GOAT in the 90s (and was mine) and he never even reached a final at the French and only had a semi in '96 where he was blown by Kafel.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,946
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I was not throwing shade at Bjorn and I know his resume. I was simply stating that from a pure statistical point of view, Nadal winning 9 of his 14 slams is comparable to other greats and that can't be used against him. I mean Sampras was considered the GOAT in the 90s (and was mine) and he never even reached a final at the French and only had a semi in '96 where he was blown by Kafel.

Fair enough. Just sayin that the comment insinuated (to me anyway) that borg was somewhat surface specific. He was great everywhere. Usually when I go about ranking players all time I use peak skills + achievements + duration (some combination). If I think that, at their best, a specific players peak was very very high then Ill rate them higher than some players who may have a better overall resume and consistency.
 

yoyoyo1

huh?
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,399
Reputation
-3,194
Daps
15,121
how you placin all these bets and getting paid out? :patrice:

im in ct. my tennis center is taking a bus trip there, might go if im still in the state at the time
5dimes and various creative yet safe methods :mjpls:


now to watch murray/peers take home the dubs title :blessed:
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
73,712
Reputation
18,426
Daps
313,084
Let's not forget that the case of Nadal and his "inflated" GS titles number is the same as Sampras with Wimby (7/14), Emerson and the Aussie (6/12), Connors and the USO (5/8), Borg and the French (6/11) and even Novak with the Aussie (5/8). The Nadal case is not rare at all and there are greats who just are too good on some surface in the era they play.

Anyway, let's get back to that female final. Serena with 3 doubles already :heh:

Nadal is lucky as hell Juan Martin del Potro is injured :heh:
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,077
Reputation
5,584
Daps
30,901
Fair enough. Just sayin that the comment insinuated (to me anyway) that borg was somewhat surface specific. He was great everywhere. Usually when I go about ranking players all time I use peak skills + achievements + duration (some combination). If I think that, at their best, a specific players peak was very very high then Ill rate them higher than some players who may have a better overall resume and consistency.
It was not really not shade considering I was putting Sampras there too and he was (and still is) my fav player growing up. Also considering how different were surfaces back then, Borg winning back to back French-British was incredible so that was definitely not my point.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,946
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
It was not really not shade considering I was putting Sampras there too and he was (and still is) my fav player growing up. Also considering how different were surfaces back then, Borg winning back to back French-British was incredible so that was definitely not my point.

:smugfavre:

Hes got so many records that he's gotta be top 5 :yeshrug:i think he only lost to world #1s in finals too :wow:

saw him play at a legends tournament on har-tru and i thought i was witnessing a god on earth..prompted me to buy his racquet and use it when i was a kid
 
Top