KyokushinKarateMan
Train hard, fight easy
It isn't a "white mindset" it's just a mindset that doesn't see it your way. You aren't the arbiter and the final say of what is or isn't "black" anyway. I don't care how many websites and blogs you've listened to and read.
And yes, people wanted violence to end, but pre crack, violence was high, but the crack epidemic highlighted the crimes plus it became much much worse in a 5 year span. Check the stats in the crack era (basically 1985 give or take). THe homicides (using NYC as an example) NEARLY DOUBLED 2600 in 1990. It peaked, and people finally said "enough is enough." 3-4 homicides related to drugs everyday in the news. So yeah, it caught people's attention.
I lived in Philly, dope had always been around, but crack put things into hyper speed. It was new, and people did anything for it, they beat, robbed, burglarized anyone, everyone and at anytime. A lot of people got caught up in the BS with it even if they didn't sell it.
Like I said, if you weren't there to witness--you won't get it.
Addicts are a tricky issue, it isn't as cut and dry as you're making it; actual dealers (unrelated to using) were the real problem, but what defined a "dealer" was anyone in possession and involved in ANY type of sale (hand to hand, third party etc).
Dealers aren't DUMB, once they understood the laws, they set up operations with look outs and sometimes they USED addicts to recruit NEW addicts in promise of getting MORE drugs. Get it?
Crack was so in demand that users would also sale and use their own stash. Dealers in some cases became addicts themselves.
SO the law, from my observation, took all of this into account, and basically swept EVERYONE into the same pile.
Whether you agree with that or not will depend on a lot of factors.
What is your point right now?
I want you to take a really deep breath right now, and ask yourself that very question. Then reply.

why are you pretending to be dumb. I presented an opinion you came with a slick remark, i had to regulate it…and that is that. 
still can't refute it huh. 
