The Refs fukked us :dahell:

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Hey retard, I"m a fan of Cp3 and Westbrook. You have been on an anti-cp3 agenda for years now. Please stop pretending to be objective. You are calling him cp0 of all things.

You just called Wesbrook a fakkit earlier.... stop it. I don't have an anti-cp3 agenda, I do however have a problem with dudes treating players with double standards,.

I know 'CP0' makes yall CP0 stans furious, that's why I do it. All you've done is blame the refs,.... even when CP0 has already said the game was on him.... you continue to blame the refs .... and yall accusing dudes of not being objective.... go figure.

 

[Goatpoacher]

You just called Wesbrook a fakkit earlier.... stop it. I don't have an anti-cp3 agenda, I do however have a problem with dudes treating players with double standards,.

I know 'CP0' makes yall CP0 stans furious, that's why I do it. All you've done is blame the refs,.... even when CP0 has already said the game was on him.... you continue to blame the refs .... and yall accusing dudes of not being objective.... go figure.

Do you bother reading? I specifically said I'm anti-thunder as of yesterday and I hope the spurs beat them next round. AT least the heat-spurs series last year was even handed in the officiating.

Refs gave this game to the Thunder. If you want to disagree, fine, but stop pretending like you access to objective truth on this matter. When the goddamn national announcers are wondering wtf is going on, that has more credibility. THere's a reason a contemporaneous utterance is treated as non-hearsay.


You can proceed with your agenda now.

 

[TheNig]

this thread

Man... what the fukk?

 

[Victim of Racism]

1. I know
2. If MIami doesn't let Danny Green and Gary Neal get wide open shots all game and LeBron isn't being a p*ssy series doesn't go 7
3. OKC has the refs
4. LeBron isn't going to be as passive as he was me thinks

Lj wasn't passive. He averaged 21 fga's and that was (as usual) more than anyone else on his team. He just missed. He was passive in 2011 when he only averaged 15 fga's OKC does have the refs, tho.

 

[Victim of Racism]

Lol @ hard evidence

A still photo of marginal contact on a non-shooter.



You're hilarious

at “marginal”!

 

[Victim of Racism]

Chris Paul said the same thing i always believe. You never want to leave the game in the hands of the refs. It should never get to that point. Especially when you were up big late in the game.

Kind of logic is this? Act like pro athletes are playing amateurs. If if were possible to blow out their opponents every game, they would do it. If they could play perfectly, they would do it. OKC put themselves in a position for the refs to have to intervene all game long because they didn't play well all game long but they still got the 3-2 series lead. Preach to the team that played best.

 

[Victim of Racism]

Lmao. What caused them to blow the lead?

Terrible calls for OKC throughout. 12 and 16 ft's for KD and RW.

 

[Victim of Racism]

What about CP3s turnover at the end?

What about OKC being down 13 with 3 mins left? They played horribly all game long but they deserved to win? I doubt it.

 

[CSquare43]

Karma's a bit*h...

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

Here's the truth of the matter... and I'm hoping someone can help me with this:

The refs messed up by not calling the foul on Barnes. It seems the out of bounds call on LAC was some sort of a make up. They can't review a foul call, only last touch. So the ref probably looked at the replay, saw this missed call and tried to do what was "just". Or the logic could have been, Barnes' swipe caused the ball to go out of bounds, only the swipe hit the arm, not the ball as originally thought, but either way the swipe caused it to go out so if he hit the ball it would have been off Barnes.That part I get.

BUT... the question is, and this is what I need help with... Did the Clips have any fouls to give? Because if they were in the penalty, that would have put Jackson on the line. Huge difference compared to possession, which allowed Westbrook to get that 3 off.

So I understand why they called the ball off Barnes but the 2 calls could have had majorly different outcomes depending on the team foul situation.

I just watched the end of the game this morning I don't have time for that Western conference, games ending well after midnight bullshyt.

Either way, I guess the refs did the best they could in that situation honestly. There was a foul call missed so they gave OKC the ball. Can't really put the blame on anybody. Just an amazing comeback. OKC made incredible plays. Only real fukk up was CP3 dribbling the ball off his foot at the end.

 

[No Homo]

Kind of logic is this? Act like pro athletes are playing amateurs. If if were possible to blow out their opponents every game, they would do it. If they could play perfectly, they would do it. OKC put themselves in a position for the refs to have to intervene all game long because they didn't play well all game long but they still got the 3-2 series lead. Preach to the team that played best.

The same logic the player on the court whos actually playing the game uses. Hes not saying blow them out every game but if you are up big you try not to lose that lead to get it to a point where one bad call loses you the game.

 

[Victim of Racism]

The same logic the player on the court whos actually playing the game uses. Hes not saying blow them out every game but if you are up big you try not to lose that lead to get it to a point where one bad call loses you the game.

Logic? More like trying to keep his money. He knows the refs were keeping OKC in the game all game long. They didn't try not to lose the lead? LA played well enough to win. OKC did not, which is why the refs rescued them all game long.

 

[Bilz]

As they said on TV, and several people said on here, Rusty was fouled on the three. The numerous turnovers is not on the refs. And TNT just explained the rule that if you have the ball in your hands and the opposing player hits your hand to knock the ball out, you retain possession. Clear enough?

very clear, right? Check 0:30 mark.

 

[Bilz]

Here's the truth of the matter... and I'm hoping someone can help me with this:

The refs messed up by not calling the foul on Barnes. It seems the out of bounds call on LAC was some sort of a make up. They can't review a foul call, only last touch. So the ref probably looked at the replay, saw this missed call and tried to do what was "just". Or the logic could have been, Barnes' swipe caused the ball to go out of bounds, only the swipe hit the arm, not the ball as originally thought, but either way the swipe caused it to go out so if he hit the ball it would have been off Barnes.That part I get.

I applaud the refs for trying to get calls right and maintain fairness (not that this particular group of clowns seemed all that interested in doing so) but I think making that call was going against their own rules.

The NBA has decided that fouls arent reviewable and that any call or no call on the court will stand at all times. I am open to them changing this, but it is what it is for the time being. So they reviewed a play in which a player was not fouled to see who touched the ball last.....and they gave the possession to the team that had touched the ball last? This just opens up the door for all kinds of fukkery.

What if they are reviewing a 2 or a 3 and during review, they see that a moving screen allowed the player to get open. Can the refs just call it a 2 (even if it was a 3) to minimize the damage?

Something needs to change here. We can't have a group of homosexual zebra stripe wearing Peter Pans taking it upon themselves to install fairness in ways the current rules don't allow or support.

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

I applaud the refs for trying to get calls right and maintain fairness (not that this particular group of clowns seemed all that interested in doing so) but I think making that call was going against their own rules.

The NBA has decided that fouls arent reviewable and that any call or no call on the court will stand at all times. I am open to them changing this, but it is what it is for the time being. So they reviewed a play in which a player was not fouled to see who touched the ball last.....and they gave the possession to the team that had touched the ball last? This just opens up the door for all kinds of fukkery.

What if they are reviewing a 2 or a 3 and during review, they see that a moving screen allowed the player to get open. Can the refs just call it a 2 (even if it was a 3) to minimize the damage?

Something needs to change here. We can't have a group of homosexual zebra stripe wearing Peter Pans taking it upon themselves to install fairness in ways the current rules don't allow or support.

I agree the system is fukked up. But what could the refs do? They blew a call so either way somebody was gonna complain. Give it to the Clips and OKC would claim they got screwed on the no call.

Looking at it from a completely objective point of view... I don't have a problem with what the refs did. The ball SHOULD have been OKC's but the only question I have is should it have been 2 shots or possession, which gave Westbrook a shot.

The refs fukked up so they tried to make the best out of the situation given the rules that were in place. But the call that was missed was the foul. Clips fans trying to gloss over that.