That's the problem. Wages for much of the population have been stagnant for decades. The cost of living continues to rise squeezing more out of less. Meanwhile at the top people like him make all the money. His company is just now getting around to raising the wages of base workers.You don't know what his financial obligations are nor what the source of that networth is ...
Even if he did retire... another CEO would get appointed to serve the exact same function and get the same pay
The companies pay according to value... if your skills are rare - companies will literally fist fight over you
That's the problem. Wages for much of the population have been stagnant for decades. The cost of living continues to rise squeezing more out of less. Meanwhile at the top people like him make all the money. His company is just now getting around to raising the wages of base workers.
Everybody should eat. Not just the people at the top.
SOCIALISM???
![]()
We live in a world of selective socialism now. Socialism is allowed when it benefits certain people and disallowed when it benefits others. The socialism that benefits the masses is loathed by the rich elite. If they could get rid of medicare and social security tomorrow with no public consequence it'd be gone. Part of the reason we don't have medicare for all is because the rich elite don't want their profit game fukked up off it not because we as a country can't afford it.If I could drop every socialism nut job off in Caracas I would![]()
You did a ton of posting in this thread and set the foundation of your entire argument on wealth being about money when that is not how wealth is defined.socialism is worse
it's better to understand what wealth is first.
If you didn't need money, would you be wealthy?does money hold actual value or is it just means of exchange
I used to think like most here when it came to "hoarding wealth"....this is a lie. The rich spend like crazy.
It's just not obvious why they have so much money when the only thing most people do here is work for money (FYI this is the most inefficient way of earning money period)
what if you could create things that people would give you money for?![]()
what do you define as wealth? or being rich?You did a ton of posting in this thread and set the foundation of your entire argument on wealth being about money when that is not how wealth is defined.
You also seem to use 'wealth' and 'rich' interchangeably, that too is not the case.
I's say if they owned 40% instead of 70% it would be more understandable. At that point the bottom 90% of the population has 60% of the wealth and such a small minority don't have almost everything.A little bit random with the discussion going on but what percentage would you guys be comfortable with in regards to the top 10% owning wealth. It’s 70% of total wealth now so what, if any, percent ownership would you be okay with for the richest 10%?
the bottom 90% struggles with wealth because they dont understand what to do with money or excessI's say if they owned 40% instead of 70% it would be more understandable. At that point the bottom 90% of the population has 60% of the wealth and such a small minority don't have almost everything.
Wealth is owning things of value that transcend money such as owning the bulk of the steel industry, owning major banks, owning the majority of the railroads, etc.. Rich is simply having more money than the average person many times over.what do you define as wealth? or being rich?![]()
not even close!Wealth is owning things of value that transcend money such as owning the bulk of the steel industry, owning major banks, owning the majority of the railroads, etc.. Rich is simply having more money than the average person many times over.
So she ends up with supplies for more lemonade than she intended. This is wealth.
The people at the top have the game rigged so that if you aren't one of them or don't establish a connection to one of them the odds are you'll never make it there. Most people don't have enough money to lean how to manage it better.the bottom 90% struggles with wealth because they dont understand what to do with money or excess
its the same reason why lotto winners/inheritances lose their fortunes