Valve is trying to widen the net for PC gaming market thru streamlined HW and peripherals, plus doing it all on an open platform in Linux.
Meanwhile, Spencer and his trillion dollar daddy is busy promoting their competition being Tik-Tok while upcharging for Xbox branding.
All they gotta do is hover around $500-$600 for the Steam Machine. The lower the better.
The difference between valve and microsoft is that valve is a gaming company. They understand their customer, and they understand the business they are in.
Microsoft is basically a b2b sales company. They're making money selling cloud computing services through azure, and they've slowly turned things that used to be bundled with windows(like office) into subscriptions. They care more about organizations using their software than the user experience of individuals. Most computers you buy have windows on it by default and the alternative is to spend several times more for an apple computer.
There's a hierarchy of importance in that company:
1.Share holders who will buy the stock if microsoft is investing in a hot new technology(right now it's a.i. within the next 5 years everyone will be focusing on personal robots).
2.Businesses who pay monthly to use cloud services(azure) and software(teams, windows, office).
3. Individual customers.
Microsoft hasn't grown into a nearly 4
TRILLION dollar company because they xbox is a commercial success or because people love windows 11 and
want microsoft office to be a subscription. They've gotten that rich because of investor hype and a basic monopoly on business software. When you understand that, their contempt for their individual customers makes perfect sense. It's the equivalent of having "fukk you money" and deciding to treat everyone you work with like shyt because even if you get fired you never have to work again.
Valve, Nintendo, and Sony are customer focused companies. Sony has no monopoly on any technologies that a business needs. Nintendo isn't pushing any subscriptions for businesses and customers(other than maybe online), and valve is not a public traded company that needs to appeal to shareholders and continue trying to attract them to keep spending money on their stock. All three are more or less committed to at least
trying to make products that customers want and making sure that those customers keep having reasons to spend. Microsoft doesn't, and that's why they can say some dumbass shyt like "we're competing with tik tok" without realizing a big chunk of tik tok content is footage from videogames and that a good videogame is so immersive that motherfukkers forget about their phone. Statements like that show a fundamental misunderstanding and honestly lack of interest in this business and their decisions have absolutely reflected that.
I genuinely hope this steam box is a smash hit and it gives linux a battery in its back so that more people are drawn to developing for it and making it a strong alternative to windows. The things Linux has going for it potentially are ease of use, privacy, and efficiency.