'The Thunder don't need Westbrook's scoring' - @GoddamnyacacProf

Is Profasi a clown for thinking this?


  • Total voters
    47
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
Your posts are very similar :manny:
Examples.

Anyway, your agendas are too strong to be taken seriously and you blatantly misuse stats to back up these agendas. First of all, Durant is a much more consistent scorer than Westbrook. If Westbrook outscores Durant, it means they BOTH went off and they probably won easily. If Durant outscores Westbrook it often means that Westbrook had a bad game.
Provide evidence of this.

A You ignore that and insist that the Thunder are better off with Westbrook being the main scorer. They're not. Theyre better when they both play well regardless of individual score totals.
I NEVER once said that they're better off with Westbrook as the main scorer, I'm just highlighting how important his scoring is. I provided those graphs to dispel the notion of 'they don't need Westbrook's scoring'.

Furthermore, you always dismiss all of the statistical evidence that shows that the Lakers have been better when Kobe scores less even though the evidence is much stronger than the evidence you are using in favor of Westbrook. Why? Because it doesn't fit your agenda.

:mindblown:

How the hell did you come to this conclusion? I think you've got me mixed up with a different poster with all these misinterpretations you keep spewing.
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,159
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,338
Reppin
Los Angeles
Examples.


Provide evidence of this.


I NEVER once said that they're better off with Westbrook as the main scorer, I'm just highlighting how important his scoring is. I provided those graphs to dispel the notion of 'they don't need Westbrook's scoring'.



:mindblown:

How the hell did you come to this conclusion? I think you've got me mixed up with a different poster with all these misinterpretations you keep spewing.
Do your own research, troll :smugfavre:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
Do your own research, troll :smugfavre:
How could you possibly know this?

And KD doesn't put the team on his back in the latter part of games in iso-situations (basically no offensive plays drawn up) and digs the team out of holes or keeps the lead-margin they have?

It seems like there's A LOT of people in here that are equalling Westbrook's aggression and demeanour as if he want's it more and has more impact than Durant who's more reserved in his output. What kind of stupid shyt is that.

So if Durant were suddenly to become erratic like Westbrook and recklessly drive without any care for his body or pull up jump shots 2 seconds into the shot clock folk would think he'd have more impact on the game?

:snoop:

If we're breaking it down to who's the most important player on the Thunder and their success it's Durant. As miniscule or as large as the gap there may be, he's their most important player.

Wait what?

Durant was doing the same thing he always does???? Scoring 30 and shooting 50% is nothing to scoff at- what else do you want him to do?. That team wouldn't work if Durant had the same temperament as Westbrook. It works because they're the yin/yang of each other. Just because he doesn't have the same aggression as Westbrook, doesn't mean he wasn't battling. Plus he averaged more 4th quarter points than Westbrook did too in that series. This 'Thunder go as far as Westbrook takes them' is absolute bullshyt. They rely on Durant as much as they do Westbrook. Please don't tell me 30 points on 50% shooting from all over the floor is empty stats....

How the hell you think Westbrook is more important to their success, I don't know.



:what:

Again you're making no sense. Why would I say Westbrook let them down? They need his assertiveness/aggression just as they need Durant's dependability and poise. Fortune favors the bold? ???? Can you imagine that team if Durant was as erratic as Westbrook and didn't really care for what kind of shot he took?

SAVE ME ALL OF THAT BULLshyt.

I came to the defense of Durant when somebody said "that team goes as far as Westbrook takes them" - that's all I initially addressed. I never alluded to Durant being better than Melo, or vice versa. He also said shooting 30PPG at 50% form Durant is not enough to be the Heat, hence me saying it's a team game (Durant shouldn't be expected to do more like he's not doing enough already), I addressed that point. Then the same person said Durant should be more "assertive" like Melo - why should he be more assertive like Melo when he's had more success than Melo and averaged more points than him over their respective careers, it doesn't add up.

All those are separate points I'm addressing - they're not directly connected. Absolutely nothing to do with Durant > Melo, but rather Durant's importance and impact on the Thunder.

:ufdup:

Next time get your facts straight before you try to derail the thread. :camby:
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,468
Reputation
610
Daps
16,198
Based on career stats:
18.6ppg, 9.9 assists, 4.4 rebounds- Cp3


20.0 ppg 6.9 assists, 4.9 rebounds - :russ:


Looking at last years numbers, it's pretty close overall (if you account for points plus assists)

CP3 is more ball dominant but he's a more willing passer than Russ. I tend to believe he makes better overall decisions. I"m far from a Westbrook detractor, but if CP3 could squeeze more efficiency out of the THunder, it would be a net benefit for them. CP3 has shown the ability to get the most out of scrubs, and he's never played with a perimeter player like KD. He might even make Ibaka look like D.West on the hornets? :ehh:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
The thread should be derailed, it sucks. Your obsession with Profasi should be handled with PM's or something.
Your ENTIRE messageboard career is based on your obsession with Kobe. Profasi is just another dude on the Summer Jam screen, he ain't special:yeshrug:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
Please try harder to convince yourself of that then. You've been acting like a scorned lover.
@Gil Scott-Heroin I guess you and this guy are right

:lolbama:
Oh ya @Gil Scott-Heroin

uhvLw.gif

He fire, I fire back. Meanwhile 90% of your posts are about Kobe. Now who really is the one that acts like a scorned lover? :rudy:
 

The 2020 New Member

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
19,769
Reputation
1,137
Daps
22,084
Reppin
:)
my team don't need nobody. we could have a 3rd string celebrity rock n' jock roster and still shyt on the whole league especially the LA quakers.
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,249
Reputation
4,990
Daps
64,848
God damn you cacs sure do stick together :cape:

That's actually an insult to decent cacs everywhere...We're not talking just any cacs, but these weirdo obsessed psychopaths bilz and goatpoacher....you're looking at some kind of elite level Axis of fakkitry here...the worst of the worst...profasi's legacy as the most obnoxious bandwagoning fakkit in SOHH/Coli history during the SSOL /Nash Suns era and the shamelessness and cowardice he showed as that team proved itself to be an overhyped win-nothing also-ran, when paired with his current run of being as much of a "suns fan" as bilz is a "kings fan" ...is enough to never take him serious...
 
Top