Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
Examples.Your posts are very similar![]()
Provide evidence of this.Anyway, your agendas are too strong to be taken seriously and you blatantly misuse stats to back up these agendas. First of all, Durant is a much more consistent scorer than Westbrook. If Westbrook outscores Durant, it means they BOTH went off and they probably won easily. If Durant outscores Westbrook it often means that Westbrook had a bad game.
I NEVER once said that they're better off with Westbrook as the main scorer, I'm just highlighting how important his scoring is. I provided those graphs to dispel the notion of 'they don't need Westbrook's scoring'.A You ignore that and insist that the Thunder are better off with Westbrook being the main scorer. They're not. Theyre better when they both play well regardless of individual score totals.
Furthermore, you always dismiss all of the statistical evidence that shows that the Lakers have been better when Kobe scores less even though the evidence is much stronger than the evidence you are using in favor of Westbrook. Why? Because it doesn't fit your agenda.

How the hell did you come to this conclusion? I think you've got me mixed up with a different poster with all these misinterpretations you keep spewing.









