'The Thunder don't need Westbrook's scoring' - @GoddamnyacacProf

Is Profasi a clown for thinking this?


  • Total voters
    47
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
Thunder have a 84% win rate with Westbrook and a 72% win rate without him - OKC have a worse record without Westbrook
Clippers have a 64% win rate with CP3 and a 70% win rate without him - LA have a better record without Paul

You say that the Thunder don't need Westbrook to win, so that unequivocally means that the Clippers don't need CP3 either. :ld:
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,793
Reputation
838
Daps
106,214
Thunder have a 84% win rate with Westbrook and a 72% win rate without him - OKC have a worse record without Westbrook
Clippers have a 64% win rate with CP3 and a 70% win rate without him - LA have a better record without Paul

You say that the Thunder don't need Westbrook to win, so that unequivocally means that the Clippers don't need CP3 either. :ld:
B for effort.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,468
Reputation
610
Daps
16,198
Oh yes, fly out the other extreme. It's the only thing you can do when you're in a losing situation. :umad:

I'm in a losing situation?

Answer this question: Did you watch the game? If not, stop posting. If westbrook is better because of a phantom foul call in your opinion, then your opinion doesn't need to be shared. You have an anti-cp3 agenda. Fine. But games like this don't help your anti-cp3 agenda.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,492
I'm in a losing situation? .
Yes you are.
Answer this question: Did you watch the game? If not, stop posting..
I think that's what you need to do, because your posts are filled with all emotion.
If westbrook is better because of a phantom foul call in your opinion, then your opinion doesn't need to be shared. You have an anti-cp3 agenda. Fine. But games like this don't help your anti-cp3 agenda.
Better because of a phantom foul? He fouled him on the elbow. And really that's besides the point you idiot. Westbrook's scoring kept them in the hunt all throughout the game, because Durant was shooting poorly. This is what idiots like you and @GoddamnyamanProf don't understand. The Thunder need Westbrook's scoring, because these things can happen if Durant is off. THEY NEED HIS SCORING. NOT A PASS FIRST POINT GUARD. AND NOT CP0.

If CP00 and Westbrook switched positions tonight, you can bet your bottom dollar the Thunder would have lost.

Typical CP0 apologist bulllshyt. Once again.
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,251
Reputation
4,990
Daps
64,849
I'm sorry. The Thunder clearly won because westbrook is the greatest guard of all time

How's your nets/heat pool looking?

Without westbrook's scoring, the clips are up comfortably in the forth and aren't in position to be fake-screwed via a cp3 turnover that led a blown foul that led to a blown out of bounds call
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,468
Reputation
610
Daps
16,198
Yes you are.

I think that's what you need to do, because your posts are filled with all emotion.

Better because of a phantom foul? He fouled him on the elbow. And really that's besides the point you idiot. Westbrook's scoring kept them in the hunt all throughout the game, because Durant was shooting poorly. This is what idiots like you and @GoddamnyamanProf don't understand. The Thunder need Westbrook's scoring, because these things can happen if Durant is off. THEY NEED HIS SCORING. NOT A PASS FIRST POINT GUARD. AND NOT CP0.

If CP00 and Westbrook switched positions tonight, you can bet your bottom dollar the Thunder would have lost.

Typical CP0 apologist bulllshyt. Once again.


So, I don't have the right to be angry over a bullshyt game? Cp3 did not foul westbrook. Westbrook fouled cp3 on that "steal" right before.

And I've never criticized westbrook for scoring you moron. I've defended him for years. Once again, you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. I don't engage in the ultra-feminine "let's keep taking shots at certain players" like you and swagnificent.

On the other hand, I don't like watching bullshyt games like this. You probably watched Mike Bibby get knocked in the face and thought "yeah, that's a foul on him". If you want to retain your credibility, back all the way the fukk up.
 
Top