'The Thunder don't need Westbrook's scoring' - @GoddamnyacacProf

[GoddamnyamanProf]

So now you're ignoring me, what happened before when you were acting all high and mighty when CP0 hit that shot?

The legitimate sporting contest ended on that shot. Everything that followed was WWE

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

If you want to retain your credibility, back all the way the fukk up.

That ship sailed long ago. This thread just the latest example.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

So, I don't have the right to be angry over a bullshyt game? Cp3 did not foul westbrook. Westbrook fouled cp3 on that "steal" right before.

I don't think you quite understand. You came in here all filled with anger saying "What the fukk is the point of posting shyt like this when you know the clippers were robbed." ---

point was that the Thunder need Westbrook's scoring. That's the point, and I uppin it proved my theory right and profasi's wrong.

And I've never criticized westbrook for scoring you moron. I've defended him for years. Once again, you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. I don't engage in the ultra-feminine "let's keep taking shots at certain players" like you and swagnificent..

Wrong. This is a thread on me defending a player while profasi was trying to shyt on him. Fair enough, if you've defended Westbrook before, but I don't see why you came in here acting like I was in the wrong for uppin this thread when it proved what I said. If you claim to have defended him for years, that you would of dapped me or not have said anything at all.

On the other hand, I don't like watching bullshyt games like this. You probably watched Mike Bibby get knocked in the face and thought "yeah, that's a foul on him". If you want to retain your credibility, back all the way the fukk up.

What does this mean? Back up on something I'm right about? How does this make any sense?

 

[Goatpoacher]

That ship sailed long ago. This thread just the latest example.

Nah, Gil Scott isn't bad people, he's just misguided and intentionally uses horrible examples because he admits he trolls. He'll see the light.

 

[Goatpoacher]

I don't think you quite understand. You came in here all filled with anger saying "What the fukk is the point of posting shyt like this when you know the clippers were robbed." ---

point was that the Thunder need Westbrook's scoring. That's the point, and I uppin it proved my theory right and profasi's wrong.




Wrong. This is a thread on me defending a player while profasi was trying to shyt on him. Fair enough, if you've defended Westbrook before, but I don't see why you came in here acting like I was in the wrong for uppin this thread when it proved what I said. If you claim to have defended him for years, that you would of dapped me or not have said anything at all.



What does this mean? Back up on something I'm right about? How does this make any sense?

We've discussed this before. Prof thinks cp3 would fit better on the thunder. Today did not disprove him or prove your theory, especially since the Clippers basically won the game. I think the THunder are effective with their two headed monster, except when they run into a team like the Heat. I think cp3 is the best pg in the league and Westbrook is 3rd or 4th, depending on if Rose ever comes back. But giving him credit for this victory is bullshyt.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

The legitimate sporting contest ended on that shot. Everything that followed was WWE

This is the bullshyt you said, with 4 minutes to go:

If the Clippers lose this game and this series, it'll be due to their insistence on feeding streaky-ass Jamal Crawford in the clutch.

with these bullshyt excuses.

Ive never seen someone with such utter contempt for facts

You getting these excuses pre-packaged before they actually happened, how the fuuck can you call them facts when these situations are yet to occur? Can you look into the future and see Jamal will be the cause of them losing? No you can't.... so stfu and let the games play out as they may.

Then you fell flat on your face when CP0 fukked up. This is what happens when you claim things as facts before they actually happen.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

We've discussed this before. Prof thinks cp3 would fit better on the thunder. Today did not disprove him or prove your theory, especially since the Clippers basically won the game. I think the THunder are effective with their two headed monster, except when they run into a team like the Heat. I think cp3 is the best pg in the league and Westbrook is 3rd or 4th, depending on if Rose ever comes back. .

It did prove me theory, because he claims the Thunder would better with CP0, because they have enough scoring options. They don't. The Thunder were only in the game because of Westbrook's scoring. Fact. If CP0 played like he did today and scored as few points, on poor shooting percentage and not getting to the rim on a regular basis... they would have lost... the game would have been out of reach by the 4th quarter.

But giving him credit for this victory is bullshyt.

Really, you don't want to give Westbrook the majority of the credit for this victory? Tell me your reasoning behind this.

 

[Bledswole]

Westbrook best point guard in the fukkin league!!!!

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

This is the bullshyt you said, with 4 minutes to go:







Then you fell flat on your face when CP0 fukked up. This is what happens when you claim things as facts before they actually happen.

This is incredible. You're really trying hard to COMPLETELY IGNORE one of the most blatant examples of rigged officiating in professional sports history! All for your agenda which is some shortbus shyt in the first place!

Speechless.

 

[Goatpoacher]

It did prove me theory, because he claims the Thunder would better with CP0, because they have enough scoring options. They don't. The Thunder were only in the game because of Westbrook's scoring. Fact. If CP0 played like he did today and scored as few points, on poor shooting percentage and not getting to the rim on a regular basis... they would have lost... the game would have been out of reach by the 4th quarter.


Really, you don't want to give Westbrook the majority of the credit for this victory? Tell me your reasoning behind this.

Upto today, I would defend westbrook but remark that his aggressiveness tends to lead to bad breaks. THe reality is, his aggressiveness should have resulted in a foul call against Cp3 on that "steal". You can't use this game as a point of comparison between cp3 and westbrook since it was prejudiced by fukking idiot refs. We've also discussed your other point before. Saying westbrook works better with Durant than cp3 is purely hypothetical and there was nothing in this game that would allow an expert to expound on the hypothetical and make a full determination. This set of data is corrupted, just like the entire nba apparently.

 

[Bledswole]

This is incredible. You're really trying hard to COMPLETELY IGNORE one of the most blatant examples of rigged officiating in professional sports history! All for your agenda which is some shortbus shyt in the first place!

Speechless.

Russell Westbrook lil fella tell cp0 play some defense!!!!!!!!









Russy best pg in the league

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

This is incredible. You're really trying hard to COMPLETELY IGNORE one of the most blatant examples of rigged officiating in professional sports history! All for your agenda which is some shortbus shyt in the first place!

Speechless.

And you're trying to ignore calling something a 'fact' before it happened, then looking like a complete fool once CP0 fukked up. I'm not ignoring the calls in the game, you're the one that's doing all the blatant ignoring. You went from blaming Crawford 'if they lose' (4 minutes) and calling it a fact before it even happened, to now blaming the officials, ...what kind of stupid shyt is that?

You're the one that constantly fails to admit when they fukked up.

 

[I.V.]

Russell Westbrook lil fella tell cp0 play some defense!!!!!!!!

Sabo didn't even shoot 50% from the floor.

 

[Bledswole]

Sabo didn't even shoot 50% from the floor.

He won,he has outplayed CP0 the entire series,he about to send him home and he averaging 27,8,8 for the entire playoffs

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Upto today, I would defend westbrook but remark that his aggressiveness tends to lead to bad breaks. THe reality is, his aggressiveness should have resulted in a foul call against Cp3 on that "steal". You can't use this game as a point of comparison between cp3 and westbrook since it was prejudiced by fukking idiot refs..

Wrong. I can use this game because 90% of it was Westbrook shytting on CP0, getting bucket after bucket. Westbrook had 1000x more influence on the result than the refs did. He scored 38 points when Durant couldn't buy a bucket, there's nobody else on this team that can pick up the scoring...... CP0 would have not put them in better position to win. it's as simple as that.

We've also discussed your other point before. Saying westbrook works better with Durant than cp3 is purely hypothetical and there was nothing in this game that would allow an expert to expound on the hypothetical and make a full determination. This set of data is corrupted, just like the entire nba apparently.

No Westbrook is better for this team. THEY NEED HIS SCORING. They were only in this game because of his scoring. How many times do I need to say this? There's nothing hypothetical about it. CP0 is not capable of scoring like Westbrook, because he doesn't have the ability to get to the rim, which the Thunder count on regularly through the game. If CP0's shot isn't going down from the outside, he he trouble scoring. Westbrook rarely has that problem.