He's right tho, they drafted 3 of their 4 all stars![]()
What does how you got the players have to do with how talented the team is. Warriors GM built a super team and LeBron did it himself. Both are super teams breh.Nah Cavs aren't deeper, not even close. GSW is like 8 deep with 2-way players which is unheard of. Great shooters, unselfish and all play hard.I think Alvin Gentry, who was an assistant coach for GS before our bum ass FO hired him, said it best about this team on Woj's podcast recently: "I'm not sure if the Warriors are the most talented or stacked team ever, but I do believe they have the best chemistry of any team I've ever seen or been involved with."
So Durant's obviously wrong but he ain't wrong at the same time in a way. On paper, the Cavs are arguably just as deep if not a slight bit deeper at least as far as offensive options go, and they're spearheaded as a whole by one of the 5 best players in NBA history, something even GS can't say they have right now. Warriors just play better basketball; more passing, real suffocating defense, less shytty shots, etc. I think they have and are gonna be so dominant because they somehow actually manage to play above their talent level; you put the 3 best shooters in NBA history on one team in basically any other system and they'll undo themselves fighting over/taking turns with the ball. It was a real problem for the big 3 in Miami for quite a while. That amazingly hasn't and won't be an issue for these guys, which is amazing/terrifying.

I think the problem is that the term is used in a derogatory way to question the players' competitive spirit. Implies that they're unfairly stacking the deck for the easy path, so of course players are going to take umbrage to it. I mean, if we're going by the strict definition, the Warriors are a super team, but I could see why KD or any other Warriors player would object to it in the context it's used.Why are these players so opposed to that phrase? As if its derogatory or some shyt. I dont get it. Who fukking cares. They and the cavs are both anomalies in terms of talent in todays nba so they are superteams. Its not even worthy of debate
What is your definition of a SuperTeamSelf made or not they still a super team
![]()

By your definition of Super Team the Warriors are the exact oppositeI think the problem is that the term is used in a derogatory way to question the players' competitive spirit. Implies that they're unfairly stacking the deck for the easy path, so of course players are going to take umbrage to it. I mean, if we're going by the strict definition, the Warriors are a super team, but I could see why KD or any other Warriors player would object to it in the context it's used.

I think the problem is that the term is used in a derogatory way to question the players' competitive spirit. Implies that they're unfairly stacking the deck for the easy path, so of course players are going to take umbrage to it. I mean, if we're going by the strict definition, the Warriors are a super team, but I could see why KD or any other Warriors player would object to it in the context it's used.
NBA players acting like mobsters when asked if they're part of the mafia
"The Cosa Nostra is a media fabrication. A myth."![]()

