I mean, I'm a little confused by this thread in all honesty. The pro Wiggins crowd is coming across like he's been proving something so farHe didn't prove shyt in college, and he hasn't proved shyt in the NBA, so why the hype? I know obviously it's way too early to say he will never amount to anything the league, but to me he was a bust in college, and because he looks good for the occasional stretch in a NBA game, its the same thing he did college, show glimpses of the what if, than disappear. Every player in the NBA has All star potential, but it's consistency which sets the stars above the rest, and he's yet to do that in college, or the league....
The Kansas freshman racked up all of four points on 1-for-6 shooting Sunday in the No. 2 seed Jayhawks’ 60-57 loss to No. 10 seed Stanford. When the game was on the line, he did not even touch the ball as backup freshman Conner Frankamp fired up frantic three-pointers.
This was the worst game of Wiggins’ career, with four turnovers and relatively minimal defensive impact compounding the shooting woes. But he’s had similar performances in the past, in wins and losses, dropping 14 or fewer points in 11 games this season.
Wiggins’ draft hype was formed before he even signed with the Jayhawks, before he fell into a lull to start the season and well before he posted 71 points and 16 rebounds in consecutive games against West Virginia and Oklahoma State earlier this month. His athleticism and natural instincts, particularly on defense, shine above other prospects.
But then he disappears.
Who gives a shyt what he did in College
He's had several extremely impressive games in the NBA, but what he did a year ago is relevant?
