There is no such thing as Radical Islam... never has been

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,439
Reputation
4,335
Daps
56,402
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
Lol they did. The Ottoman empire crushed them.

Then this thing called oil became important and gave Saudi Arabia money, undue influence and a louder voice in Muslim affairs.

Too bad some folks seem to so dependent on that sweet oil, to the point they will "spread democracy" for it:mjpls:
 

Losttribe

[Formerly Blackking]
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,458
Reputation
-790
Daps
10,686
Wrong..the Wahabbis themselves identify as muslim ..they believe in the prophet and Allah and follow the basic tenets...they may follow others you dont but they got them from the same book.

what youre doing is called the "no true scotsman fallacy"



And if im not mistaken he did go to war with some of his former business partners so apparently they WERE enemies



Wrong my question was Wahabism had a big following long before Atheism became ACCEPTABLE in the recent years..so which is the action and which the reaction

isnt it far more likely that wahabbis are the ones who helped prove how bad religion can be .

:usure:lets be honest now.
Its not a fallacy. ... their actions violate the Principles of Islam. You're opinion < 2 billion people.

2. He went to war with people after they attacked him.... A Muslim is never the aggressor.

3. Nobody needs to prove how bad religion can be. Any concept can be , and has been bad. For example some people just love the earth and nature... while others from a similar school of thought may feel All humans should be eliminated to preserve the earth.
Different is that Islam has clear rules and guidelines that make it clear who isn't Muslim
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,108
Daps
641,722
Reppin
The Deep State
Its not a fallacy. ... their actions violate the Principles of Islam. You're opinion < 2 billion people.

2. He went to war with people after they attacked him.... A Muslim is never the aggressor.

3. Nobody need to prove how bad religion can be. Any concept can be , and has been bad. For example some people just love the earth and nature... while others from a similar school of thought may feel All humans should be eliminated to preserve the earth.
Different is Islam has clear rules and guidelines that make it clear who isn't Muslim
Iv95mi1.jpg
 

Losttribe

[Formerly Blackking]
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
5,458
Reputation
-790
Daps
10,686
radical islam = accepting gays, jews and christians

regular islam = spreading islam through jihad

:coffee:

so i agree OP, there actually is no radical islam
Ignorance so deep.

Islam accepts all jews and Christians if they aren't attacking muslims.
Islam doesn't agree with fakkitry, but doesn't attack. Most Muslims world wide don't think on fakkkts.

Regular islam... states there is no compulsion in islam. This isn't Christianity. .... there isn't missionaries and all that. Only Allah makes Muslims.
And jihad isn't a bad term.... mostly it applies to fighting a war within yourself. ...

Cac amerikkans made jihad a bad word and mindless people accepted the usuage.
 

GreenGrass

All Star
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
7,131
Reputation
1,540
Daps
11,912
I guess Islam never invaded India

:martin:


yous a troll....

please go jihad yourself.. jump off a bridge...
 
Top