There Should Be A Three Million Dollar Cap On The Amount Of Money People Can Have At One Time

[The Devil's Advocate]

Why would they raise up? Who is going to raise those prices and what would be the point? All that big boss man stuff would be deaded because you would only be able to make so much.

People can inflate prices now because they can hoard till they die and longer if they have children to hand the torch to. You can inflate a ballon with carbon monoxide but it won't float, it's a bunch of hot air.

when everyone at a job makes more, the company has to pay them more... when they have to pay them more, they raise the prices of their products.... cause consumers can pay it, cause they make more money now

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

Oh word? How much do plane tickets cost? 250k? "nikkaz" gone broke off 100 million because they buy 50 million dollar mansions and new cars every month. All those things are not neccesary to live comfortable or to travel the world if you wanted. with my idea 50 million would be going into more hands period, which would help alot of people.

so what you are saying is... you'd like to have our government, be in control, of the standards of living, that they think i NEED... fukk america.. fukk my wants and desires

i should be limited to what i need, so others can get what they need... why don't we just get meal cards and gov cars then??

fukk it lets take it all the way there... everyone works, no one gets paid, you just get issued a box home, a bed, a civic, and a job.. then you get an allowance for basic food and clothes... and 2 allowances for vacation... and that's it




like i said.. you ain't saying nothing but a socialist economy... the government takes your money and decides what's best for the people

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

this also called maximum wage.... but they don't have a lifetime limit... you'd be better off with maximum wage per year... the mandatory quitting is where you got this fukked up at

A maximum wage, also often called a wage ceiling, is a legal limit on how much income an individual can earn.[1] This is a related economic concept that is complementary to the minimum wage used currently by some states to enforce minimum earnings. Both a maximum and minimum wage are methods by which wealth can be redistributed within a society.

Advocates argue that a maximum wage could limit the possibility for inflation of a currency or economy, similar to the way a minimum wage may limit deflation. If these hypotheses are true, implementing both pieces of legislation would achieve an economy with wages that cannot inflate or deflate past the point of the relative maximum/minimum wage (respectively). Accordingly, wages in the economy would hover between the maximum and minimum, and the populace would live between the two wage points. Supporters say a maximum wage could also reduce devaluation of a currency by limiting the amount any member of the populace can earn, and consequently effectively limiting the availability of currency. Economists of the monetarist school hold that this position is false; instead they believe that inflation is controlled by growth in the money supply according to the quantity theory of money, rather than through growth in actual wages

 

[Citi Trends]

let's say I get robbed
do I file some sort of form to have me go above my cap $500

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

savings isn't hoarding dude what
how are you leaving a few thou when the average doesn't make 3 mil and the avg person isn't leaving their child 100k when they except maybe in life insurance but not in personal valuable assests because you think saving is hoarding

and what you mean in the economy
if your money ain't in the bank you trusting something even worse to watch it and spend it accordingly. the government. you think they spend tax payer money on dumb shyt now imagine the field day they'll have when they start acquiring billions from people who have reached their cap

and forcing someone to stop working until they are broke so they can make money again is just not a good plan
this does not fix any of the scams and the disasters that can happen to anybody
people need security

I agree, saving is not hoarding, not until you are saving more than you would ever need in 3+ lifetimes. That's when you are a hoarder snd ultimately a parasite to society. This type of economy would actually favor the little people, the greedy monopoly men would be weeded out because they can't break the law. Of course some would try but they would be in jail eventually.

You keep skipping over that It's not stopping you from working till you are broke, just until you are under the cap. Not like most people would be trying to get back in work right away either, they'd be able to chill and enjoy living.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

I think athletes earned their money. It takes a lot of skill and dedication to make it to that level.

It does and they do, just like the mc donalds guy who has crazies trying him over a junior whopper. :...:

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

cacs r greedy they like having a system where 1 man can have 50% of a countries resources

#factsonly

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

also capping everyone would slow as down immensely when it comes to technogy development

where is the money to invent coming from if you can't make more money

Slow tech down how? Because there will never be steve jobs pt. 2? These industry oligarchs aren't the smartest people out there tech wise, just the richest. Alot of people want to advance the human race >>>>>> than make the most money they just can't because it's too expensive.

The "can't make moar moniez tho" thing is strictly a view point of the greedy.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

What would be the point of things costing more than 3 million dollars like homes if no one would be able to have 3 million dollars? So yes those things would effectively be abolished.

Also does this cap extend to business owners? Corporations? Cuz if not then rampant corruption from these entities would reach levels unfathomable...

Who needs to spend 3 mil or more on a home when everyone could have one? Tell me again who owns these home and the land they sit on and who puts the price on them? :...:


Big companies could still exist, doesn't mean they would be detrimental though, that's pure speculation. With a change in system comes a change of those in power.

 

[Citi Trends]

Slow tech down how? Because there will never be steve jobs pt. 2? These industry oligarchs aren't the smartest people out there tech wise, just the richest. Alot of people want to advance the human race >>>>>> than make the most money they just can't because it's too expensive.

The "can't make moar moniez tho" thing is strictly a view point of the greedy.

you need money to spend and invest to invent
who is doing the inventing when no one has the resources to be able to dedicate the time and money to develop something when if you go over your cap you are forced to quit making money and essentially have to wait to be able join the workforce after any sort of progress

you act like money in the bank is just under the bank's mattress waiting for you to come collect it. banks use that money. they lend it to people for mortgages, and other loans and deals.

so no money in the bank isnt just sitting in a dark room some where collecting dust and cob webs, it goes full circle into the economy. only when banks start doing shady shyt or the government gets involved is when it ruins the economy

how the hell do you create the iphone on 3 mil a lifetime while having to take pauses and breaks along the way

 

[Egomaniacal1]

Who needs to spend 3 mil or more on a home when everyone could have one? Tell me again who owns these home and the land they sit on and who puts the price on them? :...:


Big companies could still exist, doesn't mean they would be detrimental though, that's pure speculation. With a change in system comes a change of those in power.

nikka you got a problem with opulence?!?! If this shyt is about equality then there are far better options like revenue sharing so ppl are making a base salary but also get extra money off a percentage of the profits they help generate.

Last i checked american citizens own their own homes and lands(assuming you pay your taxes on it ), quite a few costing more than 3 million. Sure everyone could have a home that costs 3 million but if you wanna go there we could all live in homes way less than 3 million too, so why put the cap at 3 million? U still haven't answered that.

Also my point was more about the heads of huge corporations....business owners and how much profit they can see off their huge companies. IE an NBA owner, you gonna cap him out at 3 million when the team is making 300 million?

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

how?? how is any business gonna run... how's any work gonna get done... lets run through some

apple - i'd say at least the top 20 people at apple are millionaires past 3... so they all quit... their underlings, who make 100-200-300k a year are promoted... well they get raises too.. plus with that salary, they'll make it past their cap in a year or two since they already been making 300k.... so they quit

how fast you gonna run out of engineers and ceo's and coo's and top brass before the pool is empty?? how much will an ipod cost when you paying every employee up to 3 million dollars?? so when we need to be doing these international flights to china to check on product, then to a plant in cali, then to a store opening in london, then to a gala in paris, then to home in florida.... you think the whole business team is flying commercial the whole time???


doctor - i mean what the fukk... you gotta change your doctor every 5 years cause they keep retiring


lawyer - go to college for 15 years to become a lawyer... work for 4 years and retire... don't do any case work or study new laws for 20 years cause you're retired... have to come back to work at 50, having known shyt about the law for the past 20 years




now lets go to broke people


retail, fast food, restaurants - will never make 3 million in their entire lives... so they just work forever

who's doing the shytty jobs??? are you now A. paying all workers enough to make 3 million... or B. keeping it the same

cause who's building all these houses?? cleaning these houses?? parking my car?? making my pizza?? scrubbing the toilets?? and if they are getting 3 million like a tax writer gets 3 million... then why the fukk even go to college and study something hard





now lets go to 3 million


are you giving out a lump sum?? or you mean you make 1 mil a year, so you can only work 3 years?? or is it when you have 3 million saved, you're cut off??


cause i can make 50k a year but need 30k a year to live and provide for my family.... so how long i gotta work to make 3 mill? now how long do i have to work to stockpile 3 mil in the bank



























shall we continue on with this great idea or nah

no offense but what a load of garbage.

First it's "butbut tophats would stay in power forever!" Now it's "Butbut we need moar people!" You know how many people there are on earth breh? Lol. The goal is for humanity to prosper, not to make people drones their whole lives while only a few get privelaged living. There are literally millions of millions of people to replace a dozen or so seats every once in a while.

Doctors changed every 5 years per your example? That's a long time for maybe a days worth of paper work to be done.

Lawyers? First let me say this. You are aware people go to college to make the list for these professions because it's a career and then some to them, right? People do these things because they are passionate about them, it's not all money. Nothing is stopping a lawyer from studying law, infact, they'd probably make the best jury duty ever, more so than some random civilian.



All the jobs that have been assed out due to major chains jipping them out of a livable wage would be finally getting a fair accomidation to meet realistic living standards.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

dude the biggest flaw with your plan is it puts even more power and trust into the us government.
instead of telling them how to distribute the money we give them or doing it ourselves you literally hand everything over to them

How would the government have more power? Better yet, how would the power they have after this change be worse than what it is now?

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

Bushes worthy thread.

More like, you are 100% not worthy of having that hughey freeman avatar with this statement. Lmao

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

This has to be the most idealistic thing since the 14 points