And you didn't have an answer eitherLooks like someone doesn't want their childhood memories threatened
I asked you how do you stop the Cavs and Warriors offensively and you came back with a question, mainly because you have no answer.
And you didn't have an answer either
The elite teams in the 90s would have a much better chance at stopping this trash than the other way around
If you can't guard a big man you have to double, which leads to .......You know what
Ok breh. You really think all these modern day nikkas are better. It's retarded but whatever.
The NBA made rules to clean up the game and made it more advantageous for offenses in the process. Little to no contact being allowed on the perimeter, many more fouls being called that has allowed players like Harden to base their whole game on getting the whistle. Less tolerance for hard fouls which are almost always flagrant fouls nowadays while back in the day it would of been just a common foul.No need for quotations my brother
These offenses are historically great
Okay cool, so the fact that Ewing is one of the GOAT defensive players wouldn't allow the Knicks to press up on the shooters?
Are teams today constructed to guard against a dominant big man?
You think Patrick isn't gonna be involved in screens to get him on LeBron 24 feet from the rim? 
That was a 60 win team with John Starks as the number 2.
This is sad. It's the equivalent of someone arguing how good the Tennessee titans offense was under Jeff fisher and how nobody could handle it today (all you need to know is that the titans ran a simple one dimensional offense that was easy to gameplan for)Bruh, how is it possible you watch the games and not even see what's happening? The Cavs use Tristan Thompson in the high screen to get the C out the paint, did you not see what the Warriors did to Gobert?
This is the level of thought that goes into these kind of discussions, why would they double Patrick? They would live with him going one on one, because at best it's a 50% shot on a two pointer, on the other end they're going to take 30 threes and bank on making 10+. What would doubling him lead to anyway, a 32% three point attempt by John Starks?
'91 Detroit Pistons
1998, Chicago Bulls vs. Utah Jazz | 96-54, a 42 point victory in the NBA Finals
. At least teams move the ball now and we aren't getting games ending with scores in the 70's these days. shyt was putrid 
3's weren't a major part of the game back then as they are now. It was more about having a dominant big man. Looking back into 1994 for example, the average team shot 9 three pointers a game and made 33% of them. Today the average team shoots 25 threes a game at a 35% clip.Bruh, how is it possible you watch the games and not even see what's happening? The Cavs use Tristan Thompson in the high screen to get the C out the paint, did you not see what the Warriors did to Gobert?
This is the level of thought that goes into these kind of discussions, why would they double Patrick? They would live with him going one on one, because at best it's a 50% shot on a two pointer, on the other end they're going to take 30 threes and bank on making 10+. What would doubling him lead to anyway, a 32% three point attempt by John Starks?
