This is the Most Accurate Post-Jordan NBA Top 10 Player Rankings

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Nash and Durant being on the list makes it invalid.....

 

[SwagKingKong]

What are you basing this on? Because that list looks terrible if you're trying to measure their impact over their years. If you're only counting accolades, it's still terrible, but maybe not as terrible, I guess.

And to the ones saying Garnett should be so low, do you understand how much better prime/peak Garnett was compared to today? Ponder that, together with the fact that his impact is still MASSIVE whenever he plays. Right up there, behind the absolute top of the league.

Nash is also way underrated by your way of measuring things.

 

[LiquidMasterSwords]

Sooooooo... I haven't seen anyone mention Jason Kidd...

Edit: Finally @stilltheguru

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Jason Kidd??????????????????ugh

According to the coli, Nash is a better PG than Jason Kidd....

 

[Mic-Nificent]

Tim gets all the credit cause he's been there from the beginning you imbecile. He is the primary reason for the run the Spurs have had since 1998.

Dont hate Timmy cause he actually makes the team and players around him better unlike other superstars.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire S using Tapatalk 2

He's the primary reason for a lot of their success but lets not act like he's been playing at the same level this entire time. Yall are the ones hyping up Parker as being one of top five players in the league for nearly 3 years running.

And how am I hating on Tim Duncan? I respect the hell out of him and his game.

 

[Jax]

Kobe ain't surpassed Shaq. Stop it.

 

[L. Deezy]

Durant accomplished more in less time in the league.

he's not playing against the teams Vince had to go thru either..

Vince is greater than Durant.. its not even debateable

 

[CaughtInTWebb]

I'd put KG over Dirk off of defense alone.....for the longest people in Dallas were calling Dirk, "Irk" cause dude had absolutely no D.....

 

[Mic-Nificent]

What are you basing this on? Because that list looks terrible if you're trying to measure their impact over their years. If you're only counting accolades, it's still terrible, but maybe not as terrible, I guess.

And to the ones saying Garnett should be so low, do you understand how much better prime/peak Garnett was compared to today? Ponder that, together with the fact that his impact is still MASSIVE whenever he plays. Right up there, behind the absolute top of the league.

Nash is also way underrated by your way of measuring things.

Like I said, the guy who made this list must have only been watching the NBA the past 5 years.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

I'd put KG over Dirk off of defense alone.....for the longest people in Dallas were calling Dirk, "Irk" cause dude had absolutely no D.....

According to coli, KG isn't the player that Dirk is.....

 

[GreatestLaker]

Kevin Garnett > Dirk

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Like I said, the guy who made this list must have only been watching the NBA the past 5 years.

I see this guy has DWade higher than K.G.

 

[Mic-Nificent]

Kobe ain't surpassed Shaq. Stop it.

Even Shaq doesn't agree with this at this point

Truth be told though, the ONLY reason Shaq isn't at the top of that list is because he didn't want it bad enough. He could have EASILY been the best player of the past generation if he had a better work ethic and played consistent defense.

 

[Thegospel]

According to the coli, Nash is a better PG than Jason Kidd....

Amnesia havin negroes mayne

 

[GreatestLaker]

I see this guy has DWade higher than K.G.