Should be common practice. sources help vet your thread and will probably cease alot of senseless back and forth argument if you can justify your logic or stance based off of legit information and articles. 
Thread creation standards in HL?
- Thread starter Liu Kang
- Start date
ill
Superstar
I like what you do when you edit threads. Having the quotes/links/sources helps a lot but i don't think its necessary. Peoples sourced always get questioned and retarded articles get treated as such.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
links should always be given, it's always been common practice, there's no reason not to source where you're taking an article from... that should go without saying. on another note the conspiracy threads and more so conspiracies derailing every thread are getting tiresome.
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
this thread is silly
ill
Superstar
It's definitely essential, I have no idea why certain blue fonters create a thread with no quote and no link
He usually hides his links in the quoted article.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,072
- Reputation
- 7,977
- Daps
- 118,554
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Nomadum said:Should be common practice. sources help vet your thread and will probably cease alot of senseless back and forth argument if you can justify your logic or stance based off of legit information and articles.
Check the board...I dont even make threads anymore. 
The tyranny became unbearable.
The tyranny became unbearable.
Check the board...I dont even make threads anymore.
The tyranny became unbearable.
Any sort of attempt at trying to get this forum to be scholastic or have any sort of quality control is a waste of time. Just let it be, creh
