Three Powerful Billionaires Have Endorsed Hillary: Bloomberg, Cuban, & Today Warren Buffett :wow:

[Prince Cairo]

He's literally quoting sound bites from the DNC. A fukking vomit fest of bad ideas and happy go lucky singing and cheering by idiotic, uneducated liberals who think that if a LGBT agenda doesn't spearhead your campaign, you're a backwards candidate.

It's disgusting.

 

[blackzeus]

It's pretty safe to assume that she has the highest educated base out.
Bernie probably had most students, but people with ba/bsc and advanced degrees and advanced jobs in major cities are Hillary's base.

When they started polling they said that 36 % of all millionaires would prefer Hillary, 20 % Jeb Bush who came second. And 91 % of all democratic millionaires. 84 % of the donations from the top 10 colleges went to Hillary Clinton. And all those statistics goes on.


I'm not riding for her, I'm however not fukking with all the hate based on nothing. Clintons people were not saying that they wouldn't vote when she lost against the biggest homie. Or spreading rumors about Obama and all that type of shyt. She is a very mediocre candidate among the democrats I've seen in my lifetime but she is not completely trash, which even certain non-republicans are trying to act like she is.

 

[Prince Cairo]

To be fair, Hillary does command the support of a lot of young professionals in liberal cities (not surprisingly). But this allusion to her supporters being overall a very educated group of people is false. Plenty of people are voting for her simply because she's a woman. That doesn't strike me as prudent.

 

[10bandz]

To be fair, Hillary does command the support of a lot of young professionals in liberal cities (not surprisingly). But this allusion to her supporters being overall a very educated group of people is false. Plenty of people are voting for her simply because she's a woman. That doesn't strike me as prudent.

lets be real though a lot of people voted for Obama just because he was black

 

[10bandz]

Literally everything in this post in wrong aside from Bernie having college kids. Everything else you said is out of context or stupid. You literally proven his low information voter point. I'm sorry, but this is the type of trash that has me waiting for this election to be over so you clowns will stop posting in higher learning.

Like what the fukk are you even talking about? Hillary's base is most certainly not people with advanced degrees. What the fukk are you talking about? Hillary's base is black women over the age of 45. They literally won her the election. What the fukk does millionaires preferring HRC mean or prove? That means nothing. It's not pretty safe to assume she has the most educated base out because the average Republican is more educated than the average Democrat. As much as that may bother people, the people who are about to vote for Trump are more educated than the people who are about to vote for Hillary on average. That is unless he loses a lot more of the Republicans who voted for Romney. In that case then it would shift.

Clinton people definitely said they would not vote for Obama after she lost. Do you know what the PUMAs are? They came around later, but they were more resistant than Bernie supporters and they were old so people were shook. HRC literally started the Obama as a Muslim smear, what the fukk are you talking about? She is trash because people are now the most liberal they have been since 1973. If the SCOTUS was not at stake then nikkas would vote third party. Go take a seat.

Harry B is a cac fraud

 

[Prince Cairo]

lets be real though a lot of people voted for Obama just because he was black

Let's keep it real and say that voting for someone ONLY based on their race, color, gender, etc is not a very sustainable or strategic decision. I think that sort of voter was described above already as a "low information voter."

 

[blackzeus]

He's literally quoting sound bites from the DNC. A fukking vomit fest of bad ideas and happy go lucky singing and cheering by idiotic, uneducated liberals who think that if a LGBT agenda doesn't spearhead your campaign, you're a backwards candidate.

It's disgusting.

So to get this right, Hillary Clinton was more qualified than:

Eisenhower
Jefferson
John Quincy Adams
Roosevelt

 

[10bandz]

Let's keep it real and say that voting for someone ONLY based on their race, color, gender, etc is not a very sustainable or strategic decision. I think that sort of voter was described above already as a "low information voter."

Yeah I agree with you

You think republican women will vote for Hilary because she's a woman?

 

[Arithmetic]

Who has been more qualified besides possibly Dwight Eisenhower?

 

[Prince Cairo]

Yeah I agree with you

You think republican women will vote for Hilary because she's a woman?

Definitely not.

My guess is a lot of people just won't vote this year.

Gary Johnson is catching some traction with right wing voters who aren't crazy enough to lend Trump support, but definitely not enough to make any noise.

I think what this election showed us more than anything is that the two-party system is really starting to crack and show its age. It's dumb to think the whole of America can be split into just two groups of people; we're far more diverse, and our politics need to become a reflection of that.

Look into how many different political parties nations like Sweden and Norway have. Very advanced, Western nations with development stats that blow us out of the water.

 

[10bandz]

Definitely not.

My guess is a lot of people just won't vote this year.

Gary Johnson is catching some traction with right wing voters who aren't crazy enough to lend Trump support, but definitely not enough to make any noise.

I think what this election showed us more than anything is that the two-party system is really starting to crack and show its age. It's dumb to think the whole of America can be split into just two groups of people; we're far more diverse, and our politics need to become a reflection of that.

Look into how many different political parties nations like Sweden and Norway have. Very advanced, Western nations with development stats that blow us out of the water.

I've been thinking that too. GOP is in shambles and the Hilary was the best Democrats could do.

America stays on some dark ages shyt even though we're supposed to be some advanced country and shyt

I always wonder if we'll see the day when a 3rd party (and more) can have a realistic shot. How far down the line do you think that could be?

 

[Arithmetic]

He's literally quoting sound bites from the DNC. A fukking vomit fest of bad ideas and happy go lucky singing and cheering by idiotic, uneducated liberals who think that if a LGBT agenda doesn't spearhead your campaign, you're a backwards candidate.

It's disgusting.

Implying that i'm quoting sound bites is a weak counterpoint lol. If you're going to object, explain to me why I'm wrong. Hillary has been the first lady, senator of the state home to the financial capital of the world, and secretary of the state. There has never been anyone more prepared to step into the white house without cold feet. Period.

 

[Prince Cairo]

I've been thinking that too. GOP is in shambles and the Hilary was the best Democrats could do.

America stays on some dark ages shyt even though we're supposed to be some advanced country and shyt

I always wonder if we'll see the day when a 3rd party (and more) can have a realistic shot. How far down the line do you think that could be?

Truthfully, I don't think we'll see any serious headway on a multi-party system until the current generation in office literally all dies away. People don't like change and that's drastic change to them.

More realistically what we'll see is an overall shift to the left by the GOP itself. They'll start to give on issues one by one and the country will liberalize as a whole, but still stay within the two party system.

 

[Prince Cairo]

Implying that i'm quoting sound bites is a weak counterpoint lol. If you're going to object, explain to me why I'm wrong. Hillary has been the first lady, senator of the state home to the financial capital of the world, and secretary of the state. There has never been anyone more prepared to step into the white house without cold feet. Period.

Her entire candidacy is weak. She had to pull the veil over voters' eyes to win primaries. I won't take the time to link anything right now, but do some searching. It's all out there for you to see. No critiscm either, just facts.

 

[No1]

Truthfully, I don't think we'll see any serious headway on a multi-party system until the current generation in office literally all dies away. People don't like change and that's drastic change to them.

More realistically what we'll see is an overall shift to the left by the GOP itself. They'll start to give on issues one by one and the country will liberalize as a whole, but still stay within the two party system.

Two party system is not going anywhere until we do away with the first past the post system. In any given election you'll be a position where you can (a) vote for your conscience because your vote won't affect the overall outcome or (b) be forced to voter for the party you don't like but agree with more to prevent a worse outcome. We really do need to allow for tiered voting. People should be able to list choices 1 through 3 so they don't have a fear of someone terrible winning.