Literally everything in this post in wrong aside from Bernie having college kids. Everything else you said is out of context or stupid. You literally proven his low information voter point. I'm sorry, but this is the type of trash that has me waiting for this election to be over so you clowns will stop posting in higher learning.
Like what the fukk are you even talking about? Hillary's base is most certainly not people with advanced degrees. What the fukk are you talking about? Hillary's base is black women over the age of 45. They literally won her the election. What the fukk does millionaires preferring HRC mean or prove? That means nothing. It's not pretty safe to assume she has the most educated base out because the average Republican is more educated than the average Democrat. As much as that may bother people, the people who are about to vote for Trump are more educated than the people who are about to vote for Hillary on average. That is unless he loses a lot more of the Republicans who voted for Romney. In that case then it would shift.
Clinton people definitely said they would not vote for Obama after she lost. Do you know what the PUMAs are? They came around later, but they were more resistant than Bernie supporters and they were old so people were shook. HRC literally started the Obama as a Muslim smear, what the fukk are you talking about? She is trash because people are now the most liberal they have been since 1973. If the SCOTUS was not at stake then nikkas would vote third party. Go take a seat.
Christ, black women over 45? How many are there

. That's like saying Jewish people is her base. Yes, perhaps when you count the percentage within the group but I'm talking about absolute numbers here. And black people in general always vote for the loudest safe democrat. I know that most people in higher learning are used to discussing opinions, and not facts, which is why I stay out of this thing. I thought I was in the booth.
Look at statistics instead of using stupid ass "I've seen". The reason to why I said advanced degree working an advanced job in a major city, is because I understand that a shytty bachelor degree from a shytty school is something "everyone" from the lower middle class and up has. It doesn't tell us anything, at all. I do not call those type of people educated, particularly I do not refer to them as highly educated, I say that they have a degree.
Other than that economist showed that Hillary leads all demographics except white uneducated men.
Poll: Most-Educated Voters Favor Clinton Over Trump - Morning Consult
Education. Democrats lead by 22 points (57%-35%) in leaned party identification among adults with post-graduate degrees. The Democrats’ edge is narrower among those with college degrees or some post-graduate experience (49%-42%), and those with less education (47%-39%). Across all educational categories, women are more likely than men to affiliate with the Democratic Party or lean Democratic. The Democrats’ advantage is 35 points (64%-29%) among women with post-graduate degrees, but only eight points (50%-42%) among post-grad men.
A Deep Dive Into Party Affiliation
It’s certainly true that professors are a liberal lot and that religious skepticism is common in the academy. In a
survey of more than 1,400 professors that the sociologist Solon Simmons and I conducted in 2006, covering academics in nearly all fields and in institutions ranging from community colleges to elite universities, we found that about half of the professors identified as liberal, as compared to just one in five Americans over all. In the social sciences, humanities and natural sciences, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents outnumbered Republicans by a wide margin; among social scientists, for example, there were 10 Democrats for every Republican.
The Democrats may find they need to give up a little of their wonkiness if they want resounding victories. It’s not in their long-term interest to be too much what Pat Buchanan once referred to as “the party of the Ph.D.s.”
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/opinion/why-are-the-highly-educated-so-liberal.html?_r=0
Looking at CNN’s 2008 national election poll of almost 18,000 respondents, 44 percent identified as college graduates. Of those college graduates, Obama had an 8 percentage point advantage over then-Republican presidential nominee John McCain.
Sabato said that "the higher the education level, the more likely [voters] are to vote Democratic." Sabato bases his claim on 2008 exit polls showing this national trend. Several polls and analysis done on data from presidential elections dating back at least a decade support Sabato’s clai
None
I might have to add some Fox News as well.
So I've given you that the more education, the more likely you are to vote democrat. I've given you that for the past 8 years, democrats won among the educated. I've given you that she has dominates the most educated "races" Jewish and Asian, all PhD's, Ivey League and on. I can probably find a poll saying that republicans had more college degrees in general like 2012 or 2008, but it'll be narrow and exceedingly narrow or lost when post graduates are included.
What you probably have been looking at is "white people with college degrees ", which is largely due to white men in the south. I'm talking about recent times not Mondale vs Reagan. Now if I use your non-fact based approach, I can also assume that a fat portion of the educated base of republican voters are Rockefeller republicans, they only want lower taxes for their millions but would vote liberal on social issues. Typically the classic banker or lawyer, that has since been changing too because republicans economic policy is weak nowadays.
As far as PUMA goes, they were an infinitesimal group of supporters, no big demonstrations, no booing at the convention and on. They were like 20 crazy feminazis in total. People even claimed that some of them were just installed by McCain because they didn't even support Hillary's policies.
How can millionaires be irrelevant? The democrats have recently been the most volatile party, they have the most really poor and most rich. Least educated and most educated. The point of my initial reply was not regarding her whole base, but the fact that she has the smartest voters, so claiming that they were "low information" was an incorrect assumption.