Time isn't real

Drip Bayless

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
13,080
Reputation
2,927
Daps
56,382
I've always looked at time as an infinite collection of "now", as in present moments. Basically every moment in your life is happening "now", and how you perceive that event is relative to where you are on the linear course of "now".

That probably doesn't make any sense, so I'm going to sleep now.
This is Julian Barbour's theory. I used to agree with him
 

Drip Bayless

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
13,080
Reputation
2,927
Daps
56,382
Time is very real. The real question is why is time operates so differently from the spatial dimensions:mindblown:.
Time as we perceive it is is a social construct, but the same goes for mathematics, the speed of light, etc. These things are inherent in the universe, but our expression of them is what is a human construct.
 

YvrzTrvly

All Star
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
3,811
Reputation
-187
Daps
9,017
I realize. What i was attempting to get at was that "now" only exists as a state of mind in constant flux. clocks/time are just a reference point. In the numerical system..whats the true difference between .9repeating and 1.0? That, to me is like differentiating between present time being (for example) 11:59 and 59 seconds and 999 milliseconds and it being 12:00 and .001 milliseconds with human faculties (can make the same point with infinite reduction of time measures but didnt feel like typing that formulaic). There is no difference other than rounding for convenience and is impossible to pinpoint without technology.

Correct I'm not sure how familiar you are with math but limits and certain series prove this to be true
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,793
What i was attempting to get at was that "now" only exists as a state of mind in constant flux.
This only applies in the metaphysical sense
in the physical realm a good question can be posed
what is the smallest now possible? and how do you define it's limits?
I have thought about this before
what do you think is the smallest "now" possible?
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
This only applies in the metaphysical sense
in the physical realm a good question can be posed
what is the smallest now possible? and how do you define it's limits?
I have thought about this before
what do you think is the smallest "now" possible?

Good question indeed. From a humanistic perspective?

funny enough in your trolling you reveal the wisdom of my first question in this discussion
when you said:

I asked you

There was a method to my madness on that comment :sas2:

Perhaps "experience" isnt the right term for both a photon and a piece of ice out in neverland. I dont know. In terms of the photon, it was simply in reference to traveling at light speed. Time at light speed for a photon = what? N/A? As far as the piece of ice example...Being a trillion trillion etc light years away could mean anything..something that far away could possibly be outside of our set of dimensions. By my trolling, I was pointing towards the subjective nature of time in terms of "experiencing" as far as having a consciousness goes and the unknown circumstances of its environment...but other than that..Id say that every object not traveling at light speed can "experience" forces and have other factors going into whatever interactions they may have that can provide some sort of measure of "time"..but I wouldnt necessarily say that it would be "time" itself since I do not think that it is an inherent force of nature..just an aggregate of a bunch of other shyt.
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,170
Daps
32,532
Reppin
852
The first and second sentences were enough to make me realize that this was a bullshyt post.
Relativity alone completely refutes that.

Your body's cells are constantly renewing themselves, but each time, their efficiency drops a little. No amount of ignoring the constant march of time in our dimension will slow down your inevitable rendezvous with death.
'slowing down aging by not knowing what time it is'
A worthy contender for the most absurd serious statement on the coli.
 

IVS

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
12,687
Reputation
2,892
Daps
40,317
Reppin
In the sky
Or maybe it's the other way around. All that exist is space\time, and we are not real.

When you think about it, we are really just dust swirling in a cosmic wind, and we're part of some gargantuan ongoing chemical process. Maybe we're given with the illusion that we're separate, and we observe the cycles of space\time which is the ultimate reality.
 
Last edited:

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,793
Or maybe it's the other way around. All that exist is space\time, and we are not real.

When you think about it, we are really just dust swirling in a cosmic wind, and we're part of some gargantuan ongoing chemical process. Maybe we're given with the illusion that we're separate, and we observe the cycles of space\time which is the ultimate reality.


How do you define real?
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
The first and second sentences were enough to make me realize that this was a bullshyt post.
Relativity alone completely refutes that.

Your body's cells are constantly renewing themselves, but each time, their efficiency drops a little. No amount of ignoring the constant march of time in our dimension will slow down your inevitable rendezvous with death.
'slowing down aging by not knowing what time it is'
A worthy contender for the most absurd serious statement on the coli.

mentally which may trickle down into physical attributes

"old" people who maintain their lifestyle (usually those who exercise as well) and dont focus on how old they are getting seem to be in better shape for a longer time. when people start to give in to what society says they should or shouldnt do at their age..they start to fall off in all ways..starting with mental acuity
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,170
Daps
32,532
Reppin
852
mentally which may trickle down into physical attributes

"old" people who maintain their lifestyle (usually those who exercise as well) and dont focus on how old they are getting seem to be in better shape for a longer time. when people start to give in to what society says they should or shouldnt do at their age..they start to fall off in all ways..starting with mental acuity
Maintenance of an active lifestyle means better health, which directly correlates with better cell regeneration. There's nothing special about it. If you choose to remain active, so be it. If you think getting old means you gotta park your ass in front of a tv and do nothing then so be it too. Your choices just make you die faster.

You can't 'not know what time it is', however. You literally cannot be aware of your body ageing. All you can do is just keep moving and slow the process.
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
42,529
Reputation
5,924
Daps
118,911
Reppin
Rotten Apple
Yeah people always act surprised when I tell them this has all been one long moment and there is no beginning or end. That it is just their turn to step out of the waves and manifest they're energy and move in this universe. Like when you die you just fall back to the waves.
Sorry for going off topic
:damn:
 
  • Dap
Reactions: IVS
Top