do you see the point yet? is that piece of ice experiencing time?
ask the piece of ice, i cant speak for that man

do you see the point yet? is that piece of ice experiencing time?

This is Julian Barbour's theory. I used to agree with himI've always looked at time as an infinite collection of "now", as in present moments. Basically every moment in your life is happening "now", and how you perceive that event is relative to where you are on the linear course of "now".
That probably doesn't make any sense, so I'm going to sleep now.
.I realize. What i was attempting to get at was that "now" only exists as a state of mind in constant flux. clocks/time are just a reference point. In the numerical system..whats the true difference between .9repeating and 1.0? That, to me is like differentiating between present time being (for example) 11:59 and 59 seconds and 999 milliseconds and it being 12:00 and .001 milliseconds with human faculties (can make the same point with infinite reduction of time measures but didnt feel like typing that formulaic). There is no difference other than rounding for convenience and is impossible to pinpoint without technology.
no need to trollask the piece of ice, i cant speak for that man![]()
This only applies in the metaphysical senseWhat i was attempting to get at was that "now" only exists as a state of mind in constant flux.
funny enough in your trolling you reveal the wisdom of my first question in this discussionask the piece of ice, i cant speak for that man![]()
I asked youif photons dont experience time
what does it mean that a photon (or not) "experiences" time?
This only applies in the metaphysical sense
in the physical realm a good question can be posed
what is the smallest now possible? and how do you define it's limits?
I have thought about this before
what do you think is the smallest "now" possible?
funny enough in your trolling you reveal the wisdom of my first question in this discussion
when you said:
I asked you

Or maybe it's the other way around. All that exist is space\time, and we are not real.
When you think about it, we are really just dust swirling in a cosmic wind, and we're part of some gargantuan ongoing chemical process. Maybe we're given with the illusion that we're separate, and we observe the cycles of space\time which is the ultimate reality.
The first and second sentences were enough to make me realize that this was a bullshyt post.
Relativity alone completely refutes that.
Your body's cells are constantly renewing themselves, but each time, their efficiency drops a little. No amount of ignoring the constant march of time in our dimension will slow down your inevitable rendezvous with death.
'slowing down aging by not knowing what time it is'
A worthy contender for the most absurd serious statement on the coli.
Maintenance of an active lifestyle means better health, which directly correlates with better cell regeneration. There's nothing special about it. If you choose to remain active, so be it. If you think getting old means you gotta park your ass in front of a tv and do nothing then so be it too. Your choices just make you die faster.mentally which may trickle down into physical attributes
"old" people who maintain their lifestyle (usually those who exercise as well) and dont focus on how old they are getting seem to be in better shape for a longer time. when people start to give in to what society says they should or shouldnt do at their age..they start to fall off in all ways..starting with mental acuity
Yeah people always act surprised when I tell them this has all been one long moment and there is no beginning or end. That it is just their turn to step out of the waves and manifest they're energy and move in this universe. Like when you die you just fall back to the waves.
Sorry for going off topic
