Tinder testing $500 / mo premium dating feature

[Mirin4rmfar]

dudes might as well go back to approaching lol.

 

[Umoja]

Which makes absolutely no sense because the desirables wouldn’t have to pay for this

Basically dudes gone go from getting rejected for free to paying to get rejected

No. There is something up with their algorithm.

When I first got the app, I got over 30 matches in 1 weekend. I have dated beautiful and successful, career wise, women through the app.

The last time I used the application (over 2 years ago), I'd get about 2 to 3 matches every 2 weeks. What put me on to their bullshyt was getting matches with women I vaguely remembered swiping ages ago when I was not actively using the application.

They are in control of the algorithm. It doesn't matter how desirable you are your profile gets put at the bottom of the pile or is shown to people who are incompatible.

 

[O.T.I.S.]

They don’t even allow escorts on their platforms (obviously they work around that either way)

shyt is gonna be a gym.

I rather join one of those social clubs in Manhattan for half the price and bag bytches there.

Facts

500 I’ll take an UberXL to the nearest upscaled spot and post up too

 

[humminbird]

No. There is something up with their algorithm.

When I first got the app, I got over 30 matches in 1 weekend. I have dated beautiful and successful, career wise, women through the app.

The last time I used the application (over 2 years ago), I'd get about 2 to 3 matches every 2 weeks. What put me on to their bullshyt was getting matches with women I vaguely remembered swiping ages ago when I was not actively using the application.

They are in control of the algorithm. It doesn't matter how desirable you are your profile gets put at the bottom of the pile or is shown to people who are incompatible.

anyone who remembers the first 2 years of tinder
that was the golden age of tinder
man that app was special back then

 

[6ixSigma]

What could they realistically give you that's worth $500?

Automatically matches and you message is pinned to the top of their chats until they respond

 

[Originalman]

$500 a month.... . For $500 a month them tinder broads better be able to suck on me through my iphone screen

 

[Originalman]

tinder in 2023

pay 500 to match with bots and trannies

Exactly!

 

[martin_van_nostrand]

Tinder got the lowest grade thots on it too A sucker and his money INDEED

 

[Originalman]

Also if a dude can afford $500 a month wouldn't he just go on seeking arrangements to get a sugar baby and cut the bull shyt and middle man out? I mean seeking arrangements has a cheaper subscription. And most the women on there are sugar babies and escorts.

So a dude is paying about the same anyway. Might as well pay the 80 or 90 a month for a subscription on seeking arrangements and keep the other $410 to $420 a month for the pay per meet for the sugar baby.

 

[Child_Of_God]

Dudes basically going to be paying $500 a month for constant rejections.

 

[boriquaking]

I hope that it never becomes the primary means of securing dates. Pretty much giving them the power to determine visibility and daring options.

That one company owns like, most of the dating apps

 

[Uitomy]

All it takes now is for an app to come out where it requires you to actively look for a hook up and the niche will be the women can only swipe left so many times and will have to pay to dislike guys unlimited. 80/20 rule will still apply but trust, it’ll heard men to it which will herd the women.


So basically, neo-tinder lol

 

[downtheline]

And it is probably going to be designated by a check mark, or something like a "vip" status. You know, people love to be exclusive to others.

 

[Data-Hawk]

They are going to give you a badge that let females know you got $500 to spend on dumb shyt lol.

 

[6ixSigma]

Also if a dude can afford $500 a month wouldn't he just go on seeking arrangements to get a sugar baby and cut the bull shyt and middle man out? I mean seeking arrangements has a cheaper subscription. And most the women on there are sugar babies and escorts.

So a dude is paying about the same anyway. Might as well pay the 80 or 90 a month for a subscription on seeking arrangements and keep the other $410 to $420 a month for the pay per meet for the sugar baby.

Playing devils advocate here.

Let’s say I pay the $500 for one month and I essentially get a good amount of quality matches from that. I just need a couple to put on the roster. I wouldn’t be looking for a sugar baby arrangement but rather to significantly boost my odds with “normal” women

I say this as someone that uses tinder in cycles.