Titanfall | XB1/PC/360 | Out Now

[Liquid]

i dont recall any frame rate issues when i played the pc beta. i had the graphics settings at the max on a 1920x1200 display

also, my processor is very cheap...

AMD FX-8130P
12GB DDR3
GTX 780
1900X1200

Proving my point once again. That's a 3 year old processor with the underwhelming bulldozer architecture and still handles whatever you throw at it.

 

[Liquid]

I have now realized that Meach just argues just to argue. Its no point in reasoning with him.

He is just trying to tip toe around the fact that the xbox one is disguised as a Benz, but in reality it's just a Chrysler 300

 

[Ineedmoney504]

I never feel the frame rate drops, I mean I feel it all the time in bf4 when big structures start falling, but outside of that Im good

 

[ORDER_66]

He is just trying to tip toe around the fact that the xbox one is disguised as a Benz, but in reality it's just a Chrysler 300

A chrysler 300 with a V6 to boot.,

 

[Rice N Beans]

Not for $60.

Also Meach in here losing the battle again. XB1 still has drops with Titanfall, on the SOURCE engine, at 792p.

My old rig of an Phenom II, GTX 460 can run the game better than an XB1, using half the RAM, all of which are 4+ year old parts.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

My old rig of an Phenom II, GTX 460 can run the game better than an XB1, using half the RAM, all of which are 4+ year old parts.

Too bad that's just not true

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I have now realized that Meach just argues just to argue. Its no point in reasoning with him.

He is just trying to tip toe around the fact that the xbox one is disguised as a Benz, but in reality it's just a Chrysler 300

So this is the part where y'all just ignore reality.

That same old week 550ti runs BF4 better than a playstation 4
http://battlelog.medalofhonor.com/bf4/de/forum/threadview/2955065670126033130/

So if the Xbox is a V6 300m then the PS4 is a Charger no hemi

 

[Rice N Beans]

Too bad that's just not true

So were just gonna deny facts then? Ol "the Earth is flat" motherfukker.

Heck I'm sure even my Athlon II pos could crush the XB1 at 792p. Using parts from 2009.

 

[The G.O.D II]

So this is the part where y'all just ignore reality.

That same old week 550ti runs BF4 better than a playstation 4
http://battlelog.medalofhonor.com/bf4/de/forum/threadview/2955065670126033130/

So if the Xbox is a V6 300m then the PS4 is a Charger no hemi

No one is denying that nor trying to turn this into a PS4 vs Xbox battle You've lost it.

 

[ORDER_66]

So this is the part where y'all just ignore reality.

That same old week 550ti runs BF4 better than a playstation 4
http://battlelog.medalofhonor.com/bf4/de/forum/threadview/2955065670126033130/

So if the Xbox is a V6 300m then the PS4 is a Charger no hemi

YOU SHUT YOUR MOUTH! THE PS4 IS A SRT8 CHALLENGER WITH THE 20' RIMS AND BREMBO BRAKES. BE EASY.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

No one is denying that nor trying to turn this into a PS4 vs Xbox battle You've lost it.

So you didn't see any of these posts

Meach really needs to face at how gimped the xbox one really is when it comes to gaming. When I heard titanfall was running at 792 based off source on a system that is x86 based...I knew the GPU had to be the culprit. What is an APU on the market equivalent to the xbox one? The new high end Kaveri? We should be looking at those for comparisons not people with full dedicated nvidia or AMD gpus IMO.

the xboxone IS APU based and it's been proven time and time again that the AMD architecture is aimed towards mid-level performance. The PS4 having what I keep hearing a 7850 is the biggest difference as I said it would. The CPU and RAM are almost always secondary when playing games.

You had cats on here argue with me that the CPU is just as important if not MORE important than the GPU in gaming and my observations when the Xbox/PS4 specs were released are holding true.

PS4 advantage is clearly in the games due to the better GPU and GDDR5 RAM.

The XBOX ONE advantage should be with multimedia/tv applications as I assume the DDR3 ram in there is running at super low latency and from what I remember it's CPU clocked a little higher.

None of this shyt should come at a surprise and Meach who has a gaming PC SHOULD know this, but refuses to accept the fact that on paper the xbox one looks like a nice htpc that can play games. The PS4 is a gaming machine that can do some media. Arguing these facts makes anyone look like a dumbass time and time again.

Stronger machine? A 560ti is 3 years old and a few generations behind the GPU in the XB1

Breh. stop it.

I mean why just blatantly lie for?? Infamous running at 30fps at 1080P and is open world and the graphics are insane and here you saying we need to quit with the ps4 is much stronger 'shyt'?? No go tell Mark Cerny to quit designing stronger shyt. All them multiplatforms running at lower res and gimped framerate ain't for nothing.
Tomb Raider:

Lemme guess this is all right??

This is why sometimes I just can't take you seriously.

You mean the Xbox One version huh?
http://www.vg247.com/2014/02/07/xbo...uty-ghosts-takes-performance-hit-after-patch/

Lie about patches for your own console brehs


So you're telling me the latest patch on Ghosts didn't effect the Xbox one version of the game??
A 720p game with 40-60fps drops and yet you're pointing fingers at a 1080P version of the game exceeding 60fps. It's obvious that the game is both unoptimized on both consoles but the fact that it's still in 720p while the PS4 version got a update to 1080p says a lot but hey, stans gonna stan.

He is just trying to tip toe around the fact that the xbox one is disguised as a Benz, but in reality it's just a Chrysler 300

A chrysler 300 with a V6 to boot.,

 

[MeachTheMonster]

So were just gonna deny facts then? Ol "the Earth is flat" motherfukker.

Heck I'm sure even my Athlon II pos could crush the XB1 at 792p. Using parts from 2009.

Reality is that stronger hardware still drops frames. Which it clearly states in the article that started this thread. Not sure why everybody is pretending they missed that part

 

[Rice N Beans]

Lookey here. Parts from 2009 running Titalfall on PC, maxed out unlike the XB1, at a higher resolution, and can still hit 60fps.



Imagine if he went to 792p. Probably hit 60fps at all times.

 

[Malta]

Lookey here. Parts from 2009 running Titalfall on PC, maxed out unlike the XB1, at a higher resolution, and can still hit 60fps.



Imagine if he went to 792p. Probably hit 60fps at all times.

He's clearly lying, that video is fabricated!

 

[Malta]

Reality is that stronger hardware still drops frames. Which it clearly states in the article that started this thread. Not sure why everybody is pretending they missed that part

Dropping frames, at a much higher resolution, you keep glossing over that.

is wrong with you breh?