Titanfall: Xbox One vs PC side by side video comparison

[PS5 Pro]

Youtube compression issues are a known thing. Nothing new.

Gamersyde uncompressed footage >>>>>>>>>>>>

@MeachTheMonster knows the deal.

Didn't say there isn't a difference in compressed vs otherwise. I'm saying there isn't a difference in Titanfall
A higher resolution is not an issue because 720p for instance isn't too low of a resolution

The Nintendo Wii's biggest problem was it couldn't do HD gaming
The Wii-U nobody seems to have any issues with it outside of games, nobody is complaining about the resolution
So why complain about Titanfall? Why act like the XB1 version is so different?
You over here talkin about "If I had this super way of compressing the video.. THEN YOU'D SEE THE DIFFERENCE"

If you gotta do all that to see a difference, there is no difference then buddy
Tell us why :ufury2:

 

[MeachTheMonster]

But then when I came through and crushed the buildings with the official retail screens, you went missing in action. Nice of you to just gloss over that part.

No buildings were crushed and I didn't go missing. If anything the retail screens proves me right. Textures have been lowered as has some of the lighting details from e3.

How would you know?? You was stanning on the internet years ago?? Maybe no other games have been compared like Titanfall on THE COLI but on Neogaf I see console comparisons every day. The coli ain't representative of what's going on on the whole internet.

I'm on the coli talking to coli nikkas. Not concerned with what neogaf says. But console wars and all this flamebate shyt that goes on these days was not as rampant back then.

Minimal boost?? You're ignoring the part where people are playing the game at 1080p, 1440p, 2160P or HIGHER with maxed out settings getting 60fps??? Locked framerate is not the same as "capped" frame rate. Titanfall isn't locked at 60fps on either platform, it's capped at 60f for the Xbox one though. It can run as high as someone wants it to on PC. People can play it at 120fps on a 120hz monitor but that's not something we want to talk about right now. I wouldn't call 4k, 120fps minimal boosts.

I'm talking about computers in the $600-$1000 range. Obviously you can brute force to 4k. But getting a graphics card that's one or two steps up, doesn't give you an overall transformative experience. In the past that extra power would give you a lot more.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Didn't say there isn't a difference in compressed vs otherwise. I'm saying there isn't a difference in Titanfall
A higher resolution is not an issue because 720p for instance isn't too low of a resolution

The Nintendo Wii's biggest problem was it couldn't do HD gaming
The Wii-U nobody seems to have any issues with it outside of games, nobody is complaining about the resolution
So why complain about Titanfall? Why act like the XB1 version is so different?
You over here talkin about "If I had this super way of compressing the video.. THEN YOU'D SEE THE DIFFERENCE"

If you gotta do all that to see a difference, there is no difference then buddy
Tell us why :ufury2:

 

[PS5 Pro]

Rekka Jr. growing up fast

 

[Fatboi1]

No buildings were crushed and I didn't go missing. If anything the retail screens proves me right. Textures have been lowered as has some of the lighting details from e3.



I'm on the coli talking to coli nikkas. Not concerned with what neogaf says. But console wars and all this flamebate shyt that goes on these days was not as rampant back then.



I'm talking about computers in the $600-$1000 range. Obviously you can brute force to 4k. But getting a graphics card that's one or two steps up, doesn't give you an overall transformative experience. In the past that extra power would give you a lot more.