Title Edit: Under 2012 Turnout Rates HRC Would've Narrowly Won the Election

King of Creampies

Hop in. You coming too!
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
6,863
Reputation
3,761
Daps
34,112
Reppin
Wild Hunt
Just wow....so we as a people always have to save white folks in an election? :hhh:

Seriously? This the same woman calling our black children "Super Predators". :stopitslime:

This the same woman who was mentored by a former KKK member?

How come we understand the Game and she doesn't?

But we are considered less than but it's up to US to pick the right president for white people?

Now you have a white man in office who is fukking up everything especially for white people but WE as a people are to blame for Hillary not getting into office when her SAME white women sold her out to get a seat at the table of White Supremacy...:gucci:

Seems they forgot that the Table was only made for White Men...:comeon:.


fukk man...White Logic is just so fukking bizarre. :mindblown:

I am fed up with these people man. I can't even stand to do business with these people or even say hi to them in the street. :hubie:
 
Last edited:

Dad

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,522
Reputation
7,839
Daps
106,774
Reppin
DMV
this is the writer of the article :mjpls:


31fa00b.jpg

why he felt the need to include an interview with brothas at Upper Cutz barbershop, is suspect.
 

Dad

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,522
Reputation
7,839
Daps
106,774
Reppin
DMV
The way people are reading in here is puzzling to me....how are they reading this thinking this article is "blaming" black people?

If anything its saying...Democrats need to step their game up and do more to appeal to black voters.

this part had me scratching my head: The researchers found that, as many predicted, Hispanic turnout increased significantly—by 3.8 points nationally. Asian turnout also increased nationally by 3 points. Both groups skew Democratic. But neither boost was enough to save Clinton.

so is he saying that if blacks had turned out, things would have been different? the tone of article is kinda sketchy imo.
 

JoogJoint

In my own league.
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
14,359
Reputation
1,688
Daps
40,606
Reppin
Outer Space
I couldn't vote for her because of the email issue

:manny:

Also Trump is an outsider so he's got that going for him. It's not like he's going to fill his appointments with Goldman Sachs executives and corporate types. I feel like Trump is offering us a true progressive revolution with his election. He'll put the American people first. We can trust him.

I love that you guys think we don't like The Clintons because of emails, but ignore the laundry list of stuff that made her unelectable in the first place.

I'm (also other Americans) sick of The Clintons and other recycled politicians who do nothing but live like fat cats off the backs of Americans. The Clintons are everything wrong with the political system.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
565
Daps
22,759
Reppin
Arrakis
this part had me scratching my head: The researchers found that, as many predicted, Hispanic turnout increased significantly—by 3.8 points nationally. Asian turnout also increased nationally by 3 points. Both groups skew Democratic. But neither boost was enough to save Clinton.

so is he saying that if blacks had turned out, things would have been different? the tone of article is kinda sketchy imo.

yeah if black people had turned out for hillary the way they turned out for obama or bill hillary would have won

^^^^ why is this controversial?

to me its obvious and its something that i predicted, i think its a good thing, it sets up the narrative that if the democrat doesnt go after the black vote they will not win, we should take credit for hillary's loss, that narrative increases black leverage

also the asian and hispanic vote dont matter because one they are not as democratic as black people are and two they live in states like CA and NY that are already fully democrat
 
Last edited:

Dad

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,522
Reputation
7,839
Daps
106,774
Reppin
DMV
yeah if black people had turned out for hillary the way they turned out for obama or bill hillary would have won

^^^^ why is this controversial?

to me its obvious and its something that i predicted, i think its a good thing, it sets up the narrative that if the democrat doesnt go after the black vote they will not win, we should take credit for hillary's loss, that narrative increase black leverage

also the asian and hispanic vote dont matter because one they are not as democratic as black people are and they live in states like CA and NY that are already fully democrat

I agree with you and if the article made everything you said the focal point then I'd :salute: the writer but, that isn't the case with this article.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
565
Daps
22,759
Reppin
Arrakis
the other dynamic and narrative that was going was this notion that hispanics were the future, this was the reason why democrats were bending over backwards on amnesty and illegal immgration

hillary's loss will stop this narrative

the narrative that hillary lost because of the black vote will stop the "hispanics are the future" narrative and start the "we need black people" narrative, which is a good thing
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,670
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,551
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
The way people are reading in here is puzzling to me....how are they reading this thinking this article is "blaming" black people?

If anything its saying...Democrats need to step their game up and do more to appeal to black voters.
the title says low black turnout cost clinton the election :leostare:
 
Top