FreedMind
DOPAMINE FOR MY BABY!!
Mr. Coates does not disappoint.
Makes me want to read between the world and me again.
Makes me want to read between the world and me again.
You can't debate with a liar. You're telling a bold faced lie.You cant debate so you try your hardest to insult. Doesnt work.
You can't debate with a liar. You're telling a bold faced lie.
Trump moved racism from the euphemistic and plausibly deniable to the overt and freely claimed. This presented the country’s thinking class with a dilemma. Hillary Clinton simply could not be correct when she asserted that a large group of Americans was endorsing a candidate because of bigotry. The implications—that systemic bigotry is still central to our politics; that the country is susceptible to such bigotry; that the salt-of-the-earth Americans whom we lionize in our culture and politics are not so different from those same Americans who grin back at us in lynching photos; that Calhoun’s aim of a pan-Caucasian embrace between workers and capitalists still endures—were just too dark.
I don't either. They can never relate to it. Not even so called "allies." Rachel Dolezal, who otherwise championed black issues, could not even understand the privilege she wielded in being able to do so and could neither fathom why she received backlash in the way that she did. At some point there is a cognitive dissonance.
The focus on one subsector of Trump voters—the white working class—is puzzling, given the breadth of his white coalition. Indeed, there is a kind of theater at work in which Trump’s presidency is pawned off as a product of the white working class as opposed to a product of an entire whiteness that includes the very authors doing the pawning. The motive is clear: escapism. To accept that the bloody heirloom remains potent even now, some five decades after Martin Luther King Jr. was gunned down on a Memphis balcony—even after a black president; indeed, strengthened by the fact of that black president—is to accept that racism remains, as it has since 1776, at the heart of this country’s political life. The idea of acceptance frustrates the left. The left would much rather have a discussion about class struggles, which might entice the white working masses, instead of about the racist struggles that those same masses have historically been the agents and beneficiaries of. Moreover, to accept that whiteness brought us Donald Trump is to accept whiteness as an existential danger to the country and the world.
he was saying the same shyt early in the Obama era when everyone was still on some kumbaya shyt.I'm also curious as to this point. What else is he scared to talk about? He pretty much said that white people are the enemy of humanity. And the Atlantic published that shyt. How much more ballsy can you get?
I always felt that as good as Baldwin was, he never grasped that him being gay was responsible for like 60% of his appealIf you can name a better contemporary writer on racism then I'm all ears. I'm not saying he's Baldwin but he's the closest one in this era imo.
See this is why I tell people that that hardcore socialism talk is not going to fix anything.Heat.
I lean to the left on most issues but this is something that needs addressing.
He won it for "Between The World And Me" not for We Were Eight Years In Power....and it's not out yet...comes out 10/3....I managed to get my hands on a Advance Copy Last Week However...Book is flames
the man in in his infinite wisdom bought that 'rising tide lifts all boats' shtick...not nikkas boats thoAre you sure about that?
I would get the book but my only gripe is his lack of criticism of Barack. I can't really ride reading a book that slurps Obama to much. Not becuase Barack is bad or whatever but critical analysis is what I am looking for.
Tell me this book is not what I think it is.