I’m just not on board with the idea that black folks need our hands held, and never taking responsiblity for any of our failures.
That has literally jack shyt to do with anything I wrote about. Your entire argument is based on your assumption of a false talking point.
Even if the courses are subpar, the kids are STILL failing subpar courses. You have to work within the system. If you see your children aren’t doing well in school, then it’s up to you as a parent to get them on that level. As a community, we don’t value education. A lot of us don’t even use conjunctions when speaking. Most behavioral problems start in the home. If the kids aren’t paying attention, disrupting class, not studying, and not doing their homework, then the school isn’t the only problem. We’ve seen videos of what these teachers are dealing with. Are the parents creating relationships with the teachers? Are the parents showing up to the PTA meetings? Are they checking the homework? Just because the other side says something, doesn’t mean it’s entirely untrue.
Screaming, "Do better Black people!" obviously is not a realistic way forward. So what is your actual solution? Because you're not proposing one.
I don't reject your way of doing school because I think Black kids need their hands held. I reject it because it verifiably doesn't work. And it doesn't have jack shyt to do with race - I've worked in school systems in multiple US states in white-majority, black-majority, and latino-majority schools, as well as overseas. The problems are universal - it's only a question of which student populations are actually subjected to those problems.
Here we are asking to lower the standard in education, while simultaneously saying we aren’t getting hired for jobs just because we’re black, and need affirmative action. It’s sending the message that we really can’t measure up. That simply isn’t true when we apply ourselves. Black folks at the top of our game dance circles around everyone else.
No, it is not lowering the standard, it is RAISING the standard. That's why you don't understand.
The primary reason for creating honors classes is so honors parents can separate their students from the majority and take the resources with them, then say, "fukk y'all" to the other 85-90% left behind. The standards become much LOWER for those kids, because the system and the activist parents don't care what happens to them so long as their own kids are taken care of.
Like the research I shared shows, gifted kids perform equally well whether you have honors available or not, but the rest of the kids perform substantially worse when students are pulled out for honors. Creating an honors track doesn't raise the standards for the gifted kids because there are plenty of other ways to enrich their curriculum even when they're mainstreamed. But creating an honors track substantially depresses everyone else's education.
The goal is to work for schools that serve the entire student body better. Honors tracks work against that goal. Do you want the entire school to have high standards? Or do you only want a talented tenth to come out ahead and the rest can flounder?