Lemme just note that as a kid who did do both gifted and honors courses throughout my middleschool and highschool career , it think they were benefitial. There were more in depth conversations and studying methods we could cover in a smart classroom that the general population could not keep up with. Furthermore, if we are being honest , these courses had zero class clowns in them so it was easier for us to focus.
For example, in my senior year i recall that the general english Literature class was doing book reports with multiple choice questions on the Eragon and Hunger Games books.
Meanwhile the honors course was doing 4 page essays on literary difficult and complex books like Chinua Achebe's "things fall apart" and Jane Austen's works. THis was a Huge difference in coursework that would honestly fail 75% of the general population.
I think automatic enrollment in upper division courses and a 3 week trail period of the coursework at the honors level wouldve been more equitable than just bushing the entire honors catalogue.
As a side note, i know the college bound kids had to be a litlle angry cause many colleges look for that honors level coursework when trying to admit freshmen. THis is probably the true reason parents are heated.
from reading the article , i think this was intended to target hispanics. Because in the article , black people were 14% of enrolled and 15% of the general population. The margin of error here is 1% in etither direction so we are actually performing at par.
its the hispanics who had a 15percent difference between enrollment and the general population. And of course the Asians with the above percentage representation too.