Trevor Lawrence was supposed to be "generational"

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
34,456
Reputation
-678
Daps
70,395
Who is the last QB they hyped up to be generational who actually lived up to it

Lots of false prophets
The one drafted at #1 a year before him but still no all-pro, OPOY or MVPs. And the way it was looking yesterday. With both lines being weak, it’s gonna take some time
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
25,181
Reputation
4,765
Daps
107,213
The one drafted at #1 a year before him but still no all-pro, OPOY or MVPs. And the way it was looking yesterday. With both lines being weak, it’s gonna take some time

Michael Vick.

People might say Andrew Luck but as good as Luck was, he wasn’t this transcendent player.

Burrow or Luck seemed like my first thoughts but like you said Luck was very good and never really had a good line but didn’t seem transcendent either
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,175
Reputation
26,457
Daps
380,622
Burrow or Luck seemed like my first thoughts but like you said Luck was very good and never really had a good line but didn’t seem transcendent either
I think someone labeled generational should be that player who has a skill set or athletic talent rarely seen. Not just someone who is great.

Tom Brady was a great player. He was not what I’d call a generational talent.

Michael Vick was a generational player.
Barry Sanders was a generational player.
Who else would I put in that category? To some degree Reggie Bush. Probably Derrick Thomas?
 

Sauce Dab

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
48,368
Reputation
16,269
Daps
253,519
Who is the last QB they hyped up to be generational who actually lived up to it

Lots of false prophets
Andrew Luck lived up to the hype. Took a 2-14 team and went 11-5 his rookie year
I think someone labeled generational should be that player who has a skill set or athletic talent rarely seen. Not just someone who is great.

Tom Brady was a great player. He was not what I’d call a generational talent.

Michael Vick was a generational player.
Barry Sanders was a generational player.
Who else would I put in that category? To some degree Reggie Bush. Probably Derrick Thomas?
Vick was a generational talent but not a generational player. Barry Sanders is the perfect answer. He was a generational talent AND player. Tbh Adrian Peterson was both too IMO
 

MrFettuccinnePockets

#TeamGuapele
Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
7,955
Reputation
2,333
Daps
26,567
I think someone labeled generational should be that player who has a skill set or athletic talent rarely seen. Not just someone who is great.

Tom Brady was a great player. He was not what I’d call a generational talent.

Michael Vick was a generational player.
Barry Sanders was a generational player.
Who else would I put in that category? To some degree Reggie Bush. Probably Derrick Thomas?

Generational Player ≠ Generational Talent

Vice Versa
 

MrFettuccinnePockets

#TeamGuapele
Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
7,955
Reputation
2,333
Daps
26,567
They’re the same thing.

A generational player without generational talent is merely your typical great player.

When I hear generational talent I think natural God given ability. What you’re born with.

When I hear generational player i think legacy. The impact you left on the game when its all said and done.
 

BucciMane

Kristina Schulman Bro
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
37,917
Reputation
-2,426
Daps
82,725
Reppin
The Real Titletown
The term generational is extremely overused. In terms of the QB's I've seen that term used the most for over the past fifteen years or so, I would say it's Luck, Lawrence, and Williams are the three.

Luck just had a horrible offensive-line and bad luck with injuries. He had the talent, but you can't do anything when you're getting hit every play like he was.
 
Top