I've heard Gavin Newsom's name being thrown around, I dunno. He may come off as a coastal liberal elitist when we need a progressive champion of the people (Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders). .
Trill Maher; breaks silence on Trump election
- Thread starter the cac mamba
- Start date
the cac mamba
Veteran
i mean im just tryna think of who they should run, because i really have no fukkin idea
honestly, its really subject to change in the next few years. trump could fukk it all up, and they can run anyone. or, and i know dudes probably dont wanna hear this, its possible that trump does a good ass job. might not even be because of him, but he could preside over a period of growth. and if trump actually does a good job, the dems might as well just stay home in 2020
Tony D'Amato
It's all about the inches
Sherrod Brown should run. He looks like a Kennedy
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Lol@Gavin Newsome's American Psycho-looking ass talking to heartland, rustbelt and southern white voters.
Maher means well but he's disconnected.
Maher means well but he's disconnected.
Trump's an elite new yorker and he pulled it off
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Is this thread supposed to be a running satire or something?
thing is, we have to go somewhat republican lite. its a stepping stone. the country just elected trump, they arent just gonna go to a bernie next cycle
This is the same shyt they tried to sell Hillary on. GFTOWTBS
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Trump is a loudmouthed lizard-brained fake tough guy jagoff racist cac. He can relate to that demographic even if it's only to con them.
Obama could too because he was just so damn charismatic, calm and personable.
Gavin Newsome, nah.
Didn't Hilary '2nd worst candidate in years' Clinton just lose to Donald 'worst candidate ever' Trump, by narrow margins electorally, and receive more of the popular vote? Why would the democrats need to completely re-tool? Hilary was one of the most un charismatic foot in the mouth/too stubborn to apologize/not personable candidate we've seen, and she barely/lost/won. No need to completely re-tool.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
They need candidates that can win Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (Rust Belt areas), which means talking about bringing back manufacturing jobs and sticking it to Wall Street/corporation/the establishment. Hillary won the popular vote, but that's mainly due to noncompetitive states like California and New York.
The election night electoral vote was 306 Trump to 232 Clinton. The Electoral College vote was 304 Trump to 227 Clinton. That's not a small loss, it's a washout. Democrats have got to stop kissing the Clintons' asses and start paying attention to what the American public is saying.
This is the same shyt they tried to sell Hillary on. GFTOWTBS
The mental block is ridiculous.
Right I agree with you. However, you flip a few variables and the shyt is different. Instead of pandering to minorities, try appealing to them genuinely. Also, I think it's pretty easy to flip the 'blue wall' back around
. Personally, I would go a completely different route but that's just me. The democrats have just a big of an issue in state politics as they do in federal.They need candidates that can win Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (Rust Belt areas), which means talking about bringing back manufacturing jobs and sticking it to Wall Street/corporation/the establishment. Hillary won the popular vote, but that's mainly due to noncompetitive states like California and New York.
Or Florida and NC