Obama just needs to suspend the constitution and stay for 4 more years.
On another note, how did you just compare the two incidences? You are comparing this to Hillary's email scandal.I love how this years election only ONE candidate is held to different standards in terms of accountability.
On another note, how did you just compare the two incidences? You are comparing this to Hillary's email scandal.
Whatever you read in this article, none of it is illegal.
I think without realizing it you are very much trivializing the rule of law, but even worse you are holding a potential next U.S. President completely unaccountable of this rule.
Even worse this potential next president has so many corrupt ties with mega corporations and oppressive foreign governments and accepted money from them.
I truly do not understand how you can possibly think, at a time of zero accountability in American politics, that all is ok and that you are fine with this.
How can you be so complacent with not mediocrity but continual corruption?
But that's the problem though with this country, it's not so much the mass corruption, it's the people who allow it yourself.
Remember, Dissidence is the highest form of patriotism.
It's your duty to NEVER accept corruption, the people in power have to be chosen from much HIGHER STANDARDS than the people that get employed at a company. Because they will represent you and you are entrusting them with large amounts of power.
Never accept it, remember that. Never Ever!
This is quite a profound statement breh.If I were applying for a job and I was under investigation by the FBI would anyone hire me?
NOT a trump fan here!
He's a racist and just makes shyt up as he goes.
I only meant as a political move.
But foreign debt & violating federal law and intentional circumventing of transparency is another issue.
Not comparable.
Again not a trump fan here.
only as a political entertainerAre you a trump fan?
only as a political entertainer
only like: "WTF is he gonna say next", and love the Stephen Colbert skits about him.
that's about it.
.
Rather than accept these limitations, Deutsche Bank reorganized itself, moving its commercial banking subsidiary out of the holding company for its American operations, which also contained its investment arm. Deutsche Bank then claimed this banking subsidiary was not subject to the new Dodd-Frank regulations. The Federal Reserve didn't fall for this stunt. The bank eventually was forced to comply with Dodd-Frank requirements.
:
Oh, so they tried to implement Glass Steagall themselves and the government wouldn't allow it?![]()